Happy New Year 2020!

Dear friends, investors, philanthropists!

We heartily congratulate you on the new 2020!

We wish you luck and well-deserved success in business!

I really want to hope that in the new year the official authorities will stop obstructing our departure and will issue us travel documents, and we will begin the construction of our new plant!
We continue to confidently go towards our goal!

We wish you peace, generosity and prosperity!
We miners and metallurgists deserve this, because we are engaged in a real business, which is needed by very many people!

Happy New Year 2020!!!

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya and PhD Igor Bobin

Twitter: Top 15 tweets in 2019

1. Do you think that 2-step verification will help me from hacking? Not!
2-step verification is disabled immediately after I log into my account. From this point on, anyone can enter in my gmail without 2-step verification. More

2. We are not customers of US banks: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Schwab Bank and other USA banks. Once again we officially declare that all bank accounts in the USA connected with "our names" should be considered fake and fraudulent.  More 

3. I regardwhole campaign of pressure on me as repression, as an attempt to seize my intellectual property and make me be a powerless slave of certain forces (this is the main reason).
I will not work for the oppressors for a single hour. More

4. Why did Facebook block my account for the sixth time in ten days? Where is the freedom of speech? I write only what happens to me More 1.200

5. The Chinese company XINHAI has created a website on my behalf. The site contains advertising of state company of Chile "CODELCO". I DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE MY NAME AND MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY!  More  

6. We are cosmopolitan! Now with a real passport!   More 

7. I published "I DID NOT RECOMMEND GOLD" and "Gold (2016 film)" and Facebook blocked my account. They removed all the posts from my blog "Gladiolus", where I give recommendations to investors. More

8. They in ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of Leeds don't know the difference between minerals, metals, rocks, mineral or metal groups.. More 

9. Give me back access to my account!
About 5 days ago, unknown persons hacked my Linkedin account and disabled 2 step verification. Then the hackers added my phone to another hacker account. My Linkedin account is currently blocked and I do not have access. Be careful  More 

10. They (Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, University of London, UK) do not know what apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE  More

11. CLASSIFICATION OF FLOTATION HYDROPHOBIZATORS Mark III (HYDROPHOBIZATORS or collectors, promoters) The author of classification is Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya, 2019  More 

12. They of Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy of Germany did not find any critical mineral! Cd, In, Ga, Se, Te, Nd, Dy, Y, Ni, K are metals, but not minerals. More  320 3

13. Why Russian scientists from "National Research Technological University" MISIS, (SUPPORTED BY RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION) do not determine the flotation rate, how I do it. Why do they calculate the fictional "The flotation rate constant", which does not exist?  More

14. Dr. Ulrich Schwarz-Schampera & Professor Peter M. Herzig (Freiberg University of Mining and Technology (Germany)) wrote a book "INDIUM: Geology, Mineralogy, and Economics" In their opinion, tolovkite is an indium mineral. This is the grossest error!  More 

15. Innovator uses fashion words, phishing words: It can be diamond drilling bits, XRF, unconventional deposits. He tells you that this is not elementary field. They found it from space using satellite data. For you there is a difference, how did he find his field, if it is bullshit?  More

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

Twitter: Top 15 tweets in December, 2019

1.  This project is unprofitable. Ecological benefit is very doubtful. West Virginia Water Research Institute at West Virginia University has been awarded $5 million by the U.S. Department of Energy to continue Rare Earth Recovery Project, Build Acid Mine DrainageTreatment Facility More

2. They of Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy of Germany did not find any critical mineral! Cd, In, Ga, Se, Te, Nd, Dy, Y, Ni, K are metals, but not minerals. More

3. Why Russian scientists from "National Research Technological University" MISIS, (SUPPORTED BY RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION) do not determine the flotation rate, how I do it. Why do they calculate the fictional "The flotation rate constant", which does not exist? More

4.  This is not dissolved air flotation (DAF). This is a mechanism of forced aeration flotation, but did not dissolved air flotation. DAF feature: air bubbles form on all microparticles (hydrophobic and hydrophilic). Bubbles do not meet with particles (National Institute of Applied Sciences of Toulouse, France) More

5.  If I ask you: "What is the cars rate constant?"
You will answer me: "I do not drive at a constant speed. I accelerate and brake. I determine the speed by the speedometer." 
The flotation rate varies over time (see figure). How can a time-varying process have a rate constant? Complete nonsense! More

6. Fluorspar is not a composed material or element, but a mineral. Promethium is practically not found in nature. No one makes promethium and no one uses it. Graphite is a mineral, but not an element (С). C (carbon)? What about a carbon-free future? More

7. CLASSIFICATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITS AND RAW MATERIAL RESOURCES. Author of classification is Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya More

8.  Kozin V.Z. *Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Russia.) "Critical review to the article "Determination of average flotation rate constants on the results of testing" . How can a time-varying process have a rate constant? Complete nonsense! More

9.  Filippov L.O. (Université de Lorraine, France; National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Russia), Matinin A. S., Lekhatinov C. A. Why do they calculate the fictional "The flotation rate constant", which does not exist? More

10. Researchers of University of Rochester in New York wrote "These grooves made the surface superhydrophobic by allowing it to capture air and repel water."
IT IS NOT TRUE!!! They must treat the surface with a water repellent to make the surface hydrophobic, but they did not. More

11.  One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE, which content is 4-6%. Develop me a technology, please!"
I told him: "He found an apatite deposit. Usually, apatite is breed mineral. This occurrence is not a REE deposit." More

12.  One asks me: "We want to participate in your tender, but we do not have the mineral composition of the ore in our field. But we have a report signed by famous scientists, academics, economists..."
I answered him: "I buy mineral deposit for myself, so I only consider my opinion" More

13. Picobubbles cannot exist even theoretically!!! This is complete nonsense!!! 
The picobubbles should be 10-12м, but 1 micron is 10-6м. 
This is as how to compare one million dollars and one dollar More

14. NaOH is inorganic substances and coagulant, so it could not cause flocculation. 
Therefore, the mechanism of action is also erroneous.
Flocculants are organic substances, and coagulants are inorganic substances.
These are different mechanisms of action. More

15. Investors often ask us: "WHAT IS THE SECRET OF YOUR SUCCESS?"
We answer: "The success or failure of the case is laid more on the level of ideas. Line up and solve the problem theoretically in the head, to simulate the situation before an investment - is to make 80 % of case. More

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

Unauthorized search again?

Today, on December 27, 2019, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. during our absence, someone was in our apartment.
What for? Unauthorized search again?

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

Blog Gladiolus: Top Countries in 2019

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

Blog Gladiolus: Top 35 posts in 2019

I published 262 posts in  Blog "Gladiolus" in 2019.

1. INVESTMENT IN ME IS THE MOST RELIABLE INVESTMENT! More

2. I did not give the permission to use my scientific achievements. Never and no one More

3. Do I need to economize on flotation? NO! More

4. I DESERVE THE BEST! I CAN CHOOSE! More

5. You need my "Mineral Benefication Information System" and "Petrovsky's Matrix" More

6. For me, it's not news that the USGS does not distinguish minerals from metals. Why didn't 

anyone tell them about that for 100 years? More

7. Top 10 of the WORST REPORTS Mote

8. I didn't ask you to take away our only means of livelihood More

9. I published "I DID NOT RECOMMEND GOLD" and "Gold (2016 film)" and Facebook blocked my account More

10. Who deleted the drawing from my post about pine oil? More

11. To whom will you sell iron concentrate with a high content of silicates? More

12. THEY HACKED MY ACCOUNTS AGAIN More

13. Do American banks continue to pursue me? More

14. If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements. What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit? More

15. I buy mineral deposit for myself, so I only consider my opinion More

16. They in Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment don't know the difference between minerals, metals, rocks, mineral groups, metal groups and so on More

17. "AGENCY OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION" doesn't know that lithium, tantalum and niobium are not rare-earth metals More

18. The Chinese company XINHAI has created a website on my behalf. The site contains advertising of state company of Chile "CODELCO". I DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE MY NAME! More

19. Always be convinced with what Natalia Petrovskaya you are dealing! More

20. YOU DESERVE THE BEST! YOU CAN CHOOSE! More

21. How could the minerals remain in the slag after smelting? More

22. One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE" More

23. Investment in me is the most reliable investment! More

24. THE SEARCH More

25. I did not create this profile in TWEETCS. Who did it? More

26. I did not give permission to use my name, my intellectual property, my articles, my sites More

27. The mediators between us are a needless links More

28. They (Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, University of London, UK) do not know what apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE More

29. INNOVATOR More

30. Why Scandium and Yttrium are not-strategic metals (according to Wikipedia)? More

31. WE ARE COSMOPOLITAN! More

32. BEING MINERAL OR NOT IS IMPORTANT!!! More

33. Are the US banks chasing me again? More

34. USGS will not be able to create a "scanning system of the future" never More

35. I'm not interested in working in an university group or other scientific group or a team More

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Who removed 23 of my posts from the rating in blog Gladiolus ? What is the purpose?

These publications should not be in a rating:

• Are the US banks chasing me again? More
• Do American banks continue to pursue me? More
• To whom will you sell iron concentrate with a high content of silicates? More

They removed the following publications from the rating:

1. I didn't ask you to take away our only means of livelihood 
2. I published "I DID NOT RECOMMEND GOLD" and "Gold (2016 film)" and Facebook blocked my account
3. Who deleted the drawing from my post about pine oil? 
4. THEY HACKED MY ACCOUNTS AGAIN
5. If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements. What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit?
6. I buy mineral deposit for myself, so I only consider my opinion 
7. They in Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment don't know the difference between minerals, metals, rocks, mineral groups, metal groups and so on 
8. "AGENCY OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION" doesn't know that lithium, tantalum and niobium are not rare-earth metals
9. The Chinese company XINHAI has created a website on my behalf. The site contains advertising of state company of Chile "CODELCO". I DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE MY NAME! 
10. Always be convinced with what Natalia Petrovskaya you are dealing! 
11. YOU DESERVE THE BEST! YOU CAN CHOOSE!
12. How could the minerals remain in the slag after smelting?
13. One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE"
14. Investment in me is the most reliable investment! 
15. THE SEARCH
16. I did not create this profile in TWEETCS. Who did it? 
17. I did not give permission to use my name, my intellectual property, my articles, my sites 
18. The mediators between us are a needless links 
19. They (Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, University of London, UK) do not know what apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE 
20. INNOVATOR
21. Why Scandium and Yttrium are not-strategic metals (according to Wikipedia)?
22. WE ARE COSMOPOLITAN!
23. BEING MINERAL OR NOT IS IMPORTANT!!! 

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

This research formed the basis of the graduation project?

They in the Netherlands do not know that fluorspar and graphite are not elements, but minerals?

"Critical materials and The Netherlands – a view fromthe industrial- technological sector"  

This research was conducted by a combined team of M2i (Derk Bol, Hans Christ) and TNO (Ton Bastein, Niels van Loon, Gerrit Oosterhuis). M2i was supported by the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering at Delft University of Technology (Ivana Moerland under guidance of David Peck and Conny Bakker). This research formed the basis of the graduation project of Ivana Moerland. This report was originally published in February, 2012 and was titled ‘Kritische materialen en de Nederlandse technologische industrie’.   More

Fluorspar is not a composed material or element, but a mineral.

Promethium is practically not found in nature. No one makes promethium and no one uses it.

Graphite is a mineral, but not an element (С). 

C (carbon)? What about a carbon-free future?

Half metals can be removed from list.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

For a real scientist, the main thing is truth, but not the desire to do everything like everyone else, please everyone, adjust the results to generally accepted standards

This is not dissolved air flotation (DAF). This is a mechanism of forced aeration flotation, but did not dissolved air flotation.

DAF feature (property): air bubbles form on all microparticles (hydrophobic and hydrophilic). Bubbles do not meet with particles.

Yanping LIU (National Institute of Applied Sciences of Toulouse, France) wrote tesis doctoral "ELIMINATION DE NANOPARTICULES D'EFFLUENTS LIQUIDES". More

Tanfloc SG and Zetag 8185 are polymers, therefore they are flocculants, but not coagulants

Luan de Souza Leite, Maria Teresa Hoffmann, Luiz Antonio Daniel (University of São Paulo, Brazil) wrote "Coagulation and dissolved air flotation as a harvesting method for microalgae cultivated in wastewater". More

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

They of Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy of Germany did not find any critical mineral!

They write that they did not make calculations, but made a report on a priori information.
How can you trust other people's calculations?
How can one make a forecast for the industry of one’s country according to other people's calculations? Have they forgotten how to count on their own?
 
Indium (In), gallium (Ga), selenium (Se), cadmium (Cd), tellurium (Te), Neodymium (Nd), dysprosium (Dy), yttrium (Y), nickel (Ni), potassium (K) are metals, but not minerals.

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

Peter Viebahn, Ole Soukup, Sascha Samadi, Jens Teubler, Klaus Wiesen, Michael Ritthoff (Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Doeppersberg 19, 42103 Wuppertal, Germany) wrote "Assessing the need for critical minerals to shift the German energy system towards a high proportion of renewables"  More

How can a time-varying process have a rate constant? Complete nonsense!

If I ask you: "What is the cars  rate constant?"

You will answer me: "I do not drive at a constant speed. I accelerate and brake. I determine the speed by the speedometer."

The flotation rate varies over time (see figure).

Why Russian scientists do not determine the flotation rate, how  I do it.

Why do they calculate the fictional "The flotation rate constant",  which does not exist? How can a time-varying process have a rate constant?

 Complete nonsense!

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

"National Research Technological University" MISIS (Moscow Institute of Steel and Alloys), (SUPPORTED BY RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION) wrote: "Investigations by the foam flotation method have established the relationship between the Beloglazov flotation rate constant and the qualitatively-quantitative composition of the components in the combination of collectors. When using a combination of butyl xanthate and TC in a 1: 2 ratio, the flotation rate constant... " More

 Filippov L.O.  (Université de Lorraine, France; National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Russia), Matinin A. S., Lekhatinov C. A. "Increasing the flotation kinetics in the multizone flotation machine of a reactor-separator type, under the  influence of pulser impact in the  running mode" More

Abramov A.A. (Moscow State Mining University) "Flotation enrichment methods" basic textbook for students. 

Kozin V.Z. *Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Russia.) "Critical review to the article "Determination of average flotation rate constants on the results of testing.

Who destroyed the illustrations for the article on my blog again?

They destroyed my drawing for the article "Critical review to the article "Determination of average flotation rate constants on the results of testing" of the author: Ph.D. Vladimir Z. Kozin. Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Russia. Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference "Scientific bases and practice of processing of ores and technogenic raw materials." May 21-26, 2007." More

I wrote a post  "ACEITE DE PINO. REACTIVOS NATURALES", but they deleted the pictures. More

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

To date, there are: universal equation of flotation kinetics and also formula for the direct calculation of the flotation velocity (rate) of PhD Igor Bobin (2007)

Flotation rate constant is a fictional figure. Its purpose is only to demonstrate the existence of some scientific results of routine experiments, in the absence of actual scientific findings, a real scientific novelty.
It is time to stop this not a useful tradition.

Only people who are late for modern science, they measure and compare "flotation rate constants" today.

To date, there are: universal equation of flotation kinetics and also formula for the direct calculation of the flotation velocity (rate) of PhD Igor Bobin (2007).
These mathematical tools allow you to describe adequately the kinetics and dynamics of the flotation process. Thus you can see and use directly the current value of the flotation velocity at each time point.

To date, there are: universal equation of flotation kinetics and also formula for the direct calculation of the flotation velocity (rate). These mathematical tools allow you to describe adequately the kinetics and dynamics of the flotation process. Thus you can see and use directly the current value of the flotation velocity at each time point.

If we compare such modern mathematical tools of PhD Igor Bobin and "flotation rate constant" then it is possible to draw an analogy with two cars: one of which has precise speedometer with recording of speed values (direct mapping of speed at any given time); another car has only a ribbon tied on the top of antenna by which you can indirectly judge the speed ("speed constant"). What car is better for you?
Any comments are simply unnecessary.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Tsvetichanin, D. Vučinić, P. Lazic, M. Kostović (University of Belgrade, Serbia) More

Vidyadhar Ari, A Das (CSIR, National Metallurgical Laboratory, India) wrote "Kinetics and efficacy of froth flotation for the recovery of metal values from pulverized printed circuit boards" More

A. A. Mazurik, E. A. Streltsova, V. V. Menchuk (Odessa National University, Ukraine)

Filippov L, Matinin A.University of Lorraine (France)National University of Science and Technology MISiS (Russia)

 

What flotation method did they use?

Thi Thuy Bui, Mooyoung Han (Seoul National University, South Korea) wrote "Removal of Phormidium sp. by positively charged bubble flotation": "...Algal removal by flocculation was determined by jar tests and by the batch dissolved air flotation (BDAF) method with bubble generation and flotation..."
What flotation method did they actually use?
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Flocculants are organic substances, and coagulants are inorganic substances. These are different mechanisms of action

Alexandre Bessona, Cécile Formosa-Dagueabc, Pascal Guiraudac (Université de Toulouse, France) wrote "Flocculation-flotation harvesting mechanism of Dunaliella salina: From nanoscale interpretation to industrial optimization": "... using flocculation/flotation harvesting induced by NaOH addition in the medium... Based on this understanding of the flocculation mechanism, we then evaluate the influence of several parameters related to NaOH mixing and magnesium hydroxide precipitation..." More

They are wrong.
NaOH is inorganic substances and coagulant, so it could not cause flocculation.
Therefore, the mechanism of action is also erroneous.
Flocculants are organic substances, and coagulants are inorganic substances.
These are different mechanisms of action.
  Ph,D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Twitter: Top 10 tweets in November, 2019

1. Give me back access to my account! About 5 days ago, unknown persons hacked my Linkedin account and disabled 2 step verification. Then the hackers added my phone to another hacker account. My Linkedin account is currently blocked and I do not have access. Be careful! More

2. The Chinese company XINHAI has created a website on my behalf.
The site contains advertising of state company of Chile "CODELCO".
I DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE MY NAME AND MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY! More

3. Dr. Ulrich Schwarz-Schampera & Professor Peter M. Herzig (Freiberg University of Mining and Technology (Germany)) wrote a book "INDIUM: Geology, Mineralogy, and Economics" In their opinion, tolovkite is an indium mineral. This is the grossest error! More

4. Innovator uses fashion words, phishing words: It can be diamond drilling bits, XRF, unconventional deposits.
He tells you that this is not elementary field. They found it from space using satellite data.
For you there is a difference, how did he find his field, if it is bullshit? More

5. They (Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, University of London, UK) do not know what apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE. More

6. I have nothing to do with this state company "CODELCO". Who did this and for what purpose? I never received a single penny from CODELCO. The state company CODELCO does not have anything to boast about? Why do they use my name and my scientific works to get fame. More

7. Researchers of University of Rochester in New York wrote "These grooves made the surface superhydrophobic by allowing it to capture air and repel water."
IT IS NOT TRUE!!!
They must treat the surface with a water repellent to make the surface hydrophobic, but they did not. More

8. Daniel Tao, Rick Honaker (University of Kentucky) wroted : "Picobubbles (usually less than 1 micron) selectively attach to the hydrophobic coal particles..."
The picobubbles should be 10-12м, but 1 micron is 10-6м.
This is as how to compare one million dollars and one dollar. More

9. One asked me: "What is the economic efficiency: "The West Virginia Water Research Institute at West Virginia University has been awarded $5 million by the U.S. Department of Energy to continue Rare Earth Recovery Project, Build Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Facilit"" More
 
10. Several countries and universities try to attribute our merit to its self. But they do not have anything, except their positions and rights of the signature in university, country. They do not own our knowledge; they do not have the authorship in our inventions and our know-how. More

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya 

Gladiolus: Top 15 posts in November, 2019

1.  You need my "Mineral Benefication Information System" and "Petrovsky's Matrix" More

2. INVESTMENT IN ME IS THE MOST RELIABLE INVESTMENT! More

3.  I did not give the permission to use my scientific achievements. Never and no one More

4. I DESERVE THE BEST! I CAN CHOOSE! More

5. Do I need to economize on flotation? NO! More

6.  Picobubbles cannot exist even theoretically!!! This is complete nonsense!!! More

7.  I didn't ask you to take away our only means of livelihood More

8. This project is unprofitable. Ecological benefit is very doubtful "Rare Earth Recovery Project, Build Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Facility" More

9. "AGENCY OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION" doesn't know that lithium, tantalum and niobium are not rare-earth metals More

10.  I published "I DID NOT RECOMMEND GOLD" and "Gold (2016 film)" and Facebook blocked my account More

11. The effect of nanobubbles on flotation is not straightforward More

12.  This is as how to compare one million dollars and one dollar More

13. Why did they examine the charge of the bubble and not the effect of the size of the bubble? More

14. I do not want to participate in lie. Therefore, I do not want to work in an academic environment More

15. SHOW BUSINESS vs. ACADEMIC SCIENCE More

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

Blog Gladiolus: Top 10 country in November, 2019

Persons from these countries most often visit the blog Gladiolus in November:
1. United States (1 in the overall rating)
2. Germany (3 in the overall rating)
3. United Kingdom (8 in the overall rating)
4. Russia (7 in the overall rating)
5. France (4 in the overall rating)
6. India
7. Ukraine (5 in the overall rating)
8. Canada (9 in the overall rating)
9. Unknown Region (6 in the overall rating)
10. Kazakhstan

PhD Natalia Petrovskaya

SHOW BUSINESS vs. ACADEMIC SCIENCE

One asked me: “Who does more for science? Show business or official scientists from universities?”

 I replied: "Show business, television does more good for science, for its popularization. 
In 2007, I suggested that the gas-gas interface exists, but I had no evidence. In 2011, The show business proved my point.
Official science still insist that the gas-gas interface does not exist.
Look the video! The boat floats at the gas-gas interface."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

How do you use your favorite and delightful fireplaces today? Firewood and coal are prohibited types of fuels

A court sentenced to restriction of freedom of a man who burned wood and coal in the oven for heating.
He violated the resolution against smog. More

This story happened in Krakow in Poland in November 2019.
Who invented such atrocities?

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 References
1. https://www.polskieradio24.pl/5/1222/Artykul/2407045,Zlamal-uchwale-antysmogowa-w-Krakowie-Wyrok-za-palenie-w-piecu-weglem-i-drewnem
2. https://www.quickenloans.com/blog/builtin-freestanding-fireplace-option-home
3. https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2785284.html

Why did Twitter block me and don’t want to help me?

Why did you block me and don’t want to help me? Why did Twitter turn off 2-step verification of my account? This was done precisely by Twitter, because I change phone numbers and companies, but the code does not come.
All my accounts have been hacked.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 

Goodbye, Academy!

You often ask me: "Why do not you want to work in an academic environment at the university of some country?"

I answer: "It's true." I really do not want this."

I do not take judging about the scope of scientific knowledge from which I am far. However, what they (academic science) write in their articles about my whole area of the mineral processing, this is a complete nightmare and ignorance. I read the articles in different languages and I am horrified. These "scientists" do not even understand what they write. Most of them simply rewrite other mistakes and misconceptions. This is not science. If there are guides, then the processing of minerals is in a steep peak. The poor Earth Climate will not take away this ignorance. 
 This is not my way.

Academic community seeks to score each scientist a label of the country, scientific school or university: "If a scientist  reached any scientific heights, this is not his merit, but it means that his country (which of them?) is such a "great" and "wise" (scientific school or university too). This is not discussed! In their opinion, the personal merit of the scientist does not exist without THE MERIT OF THE UNIVERSITY. So the delegations go to establish academic exchanges. Agreements on intent are signed. They appoint official "teachers" and "disciples" of this scientific genius, so that these official "teachers" and "disciples" sign any fraudulent contracts and projects without reading. The lie is multiplied.
But I do not want to participate in this lie! 

I do not have any teachers or disciples! I was taught only on basics of sciences as well as thousands of others students. I reached my wisdom by self-knowledge! And I did not give to anyone the depth of my knowledge, I did not teach anyone. Everyone who calls himself as my disciple (or teacher) - is the IMPOSTER. 

We are cosmopolitans! 

We work for all of humanity, not for a country or a university. We are working independently for many years.   We are in us self. Do not associate us with some country, scientific school or university!
They do not own our knowledge; they do not have the authorship in our inventions and our know-how. Several countries and universities try to attribute our merit to its self. But they do not have anything, except their positions and rights of the signature in their  university and their country.
We are not serfs! We do not belong to them as the results of our work too!  
They can not create anything  really working, but only counterfeit and only on paper.

The role of personality in science is strongly underestimated. This is one of the distributed mistakes of our time.

I'm reading the academic scientific articles, I see that they contain a huge number of errors and deception. I do the comments, but they persistently rewrite the lie from each other and a lie is multiplying.
I feel myself as "Gelsomino in the country of liars".

We try to follow principles of  Real Scientist, one of which is NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LIE. 

I do not want to participate in Lie! Therefore, I do not want to work in an academic environment.
I'm an independent scientist!

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya
    
References
1.    Igor Bobin, Natalia Petrovskaya WHY ARE WE DOING PERSONAL RESEARCH? More
2.    A. Solzhenitsyn “Living not according to a lie”

The turtle can overtake the hare

How did they want to measure bubbles with a diameter of 10^-12м, if the device (Cillas 1064 laser particle size analyzer) has a resolution only in the range from 4 x 10^-8 to 5 x 10^-4м? Where are the picobubbles? Well, at least nanobubbles? Not!

Picobubbles cannot exist even theoretically!!! This is complete nonsense!!! More

 At the very beginning of the study, they found that the smallest particles have the highest ash content. In fact, particles less than 0.5 mm are ash. Why didn’t they stop researching and continue to float them? What is the purpose of extracting ash into concentrate?

They write that the bubbles are small bubbles have a low rate of rise, but the flotation rate increased by 200%. How is this possible?  The turtle can overtake the hare.

Daniel Tao, Rick Honaker (University of Kentucky) wroted "Improving Coal Flotation Recovery Using Cavitation Concepts (KY007) More: "Picobubbles (usually less than 1 micron) selectively attach to the hydrophobic coal particles...

The picobubbles should be 10^-12м, but 1 micron is 10^-6м.
This is as how to compare one million dollars and one dollar.

.... Preliminary results indicate that the flotation rate of -100 mesh Coalberg coal can be increased by at least 200% by using an air eductor to pretreat the feed with submicron bubbles.
 They are characterized by an inherently high probability of collision with particles and high probability of attachment and low probability of detachment due to their tiny size, low ascending velocity and rebound velocity from the surface, and high surface free energy to be satisfied, and therefore are very effective for enhancing flotation recovery of fine and coarse particles..."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya