Top 10 tweets in February on Twitter , 2018

1. For me, it's not news that the USGS does not distinguish minerals from metals. Why didn't anyone tell them about that for 100 years? (1 in the overall ranking in Blog Gladiolus)


2.  MINING MONEYBALL (3 in the overall ranking in Blog Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya)


3.  How to separate the GOLD and PLATINUM? Gravity separation? No! Flotation? Also no!Electrical separation? Yes! (Blog Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya)


4.  If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements. What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit? (5 in the overall ranking in Blog Gladiolus


5.  Our "philosophy of beneficiation" is based on rigorous mathematical analysis plus our knowledge and experience.
We can help you get into the playoffs of the world league at low cost.
No guesswork - only a rigorous science! (3 in the overall ranking in Blog Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya)


6. They asked me very often: "How to separate phosphate from carbonate?" My answer: "You need to ask a more specific question. What are the MINERALS that need to be separated?  (Blog Gladiolus)


7. One asked me: "Geologists have discovered a new site. This ore contains chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite. What risks?"
My answer: "The risks are very high. Geologists have made gross errors. Investors can lose a money with this occurrense". (Blog Gladiolus)


8. CLASSIFICATION OF MINERALS BASED ON THE ABILITY TO BE SUPPRESSED BY POLYMERS AT FLOTATION By Natalia Petrovskaya  (Blog Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya)


9. One man invites to buy a deposit that contains vanadium, rhenium, gold, platinum, palladium, uranium, molybdenum, copper, nickel, lead and REE. What will you advise me? (Blog Gladiolus


10.  What "Liberty Star" is looking for in The Hay Mountain in Arizona?Many people ask me to give free advice. I will show you one example. Within 2.5 years I received from the "Liberty Star" more than 50 letters. Read some letters.  (5 in the overall ranking in Blog Gladiolus)
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Gladiolus: Top 10 posts in February, 2018

1. For me, it's not news that the USGS does not distinguish minerals from metals. Why didn't anyone tell them about that for 100 years? (1 in the overall ranking)

2. One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE"  (2 in the overall ranking)

3. If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements. What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit?  (5 in the overall ranking)

4. Top 10 articles in Linkedin for 2016  (7 in the overall ranking)

5.  THEY HACKED MY ACCOUNTS AGAIN  (3 in the overall ranking)

6  Why did not Linkedin like my publication? Why did Linkedin hide it from you?

7. One from Antofagasta minerals writes to me: "Could you help us (collaboration)?"

8. This ore contains chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite. What risks

9. What does the freedom of speech mean for a scientist?

10. Christopher Ecclestone (Mining Strategist at Hallgarten & Company Ltd, London, UK) published two reports. My opinion. 

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

They hack into our accounts every day

Today they hacked my husband's account.  I do not live in Las Condes. They hacked his accounts on Twitter and on LinkedIn.
Yesterday I changed the password 3 times. Perhaps that's why they did not delete this letter from my email. 

March 8, 2018. They hacked my husband's account again.

You can read also
THEY HACKED MY ACCOUNTS AGAIN
Be careful! Unknown people systematically hack into my accounts
DID THEY HACKED MY SITES?

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

For me, it's not news that the USGS does not distinguish minerals from metals. Why didn't anyone tell them about that for 100 years?

They wrote in the article "Critical minerals order. Trump executive order calls for an American critical minerals strategy" (Mining News): "With this definition, the USGS (U.S. Geological Survey)  has identified 23 critical minerals – antimony, barite, beryllium, cobalt, fluorite or fluorspar, gallium, germanium, graphite, hafnium, indium, lithium, manganese, niobium, platinum group elements, rare earth elements, rhenium, selenium, tantalum, tellurium, tin, titanium, vanadium, and zirconium."  More...

USGS has identified 3 critical minerals: barite, fluorite, graphite. The remaining 20 are metals!

They wrote: "The terms critical minerals and strategic minerals were first used in the United States during World War I."

Has passed 100 years, and they have defined only 3 critical minerals?
For me, it's not news that the USGS does not distinguish minerals from metals. I have written to him many times about this.
I was surprised by something else.
Why didn't anyone tell them about that for 100 years?

The negative consequences of this error: Investors will see the difference very well. Lead costs (METAL PRICE) $ 1.0 but lead concentrate costs (MINERAL PRICE) $ 0.2-0.3. Everyday, investors will have a significant loss of money ($ 0.7-0.8).

You can read also

They in Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment don't know the difference between minerals, metals, rocks, mineral groups, metal groups and so on

 What does THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION does not know about "Critical Raw Materials"?

I can't trust this report of the World Bank and ICMM

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya



If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements. What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit?

Many people ask me to give free advice.
I will show you one example. Within 2.5 years I received from the "Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp. " more than 50 letters. Read some letters. More

They discover copper, sometimes silver, sometimes gold, rare earth elements. Then many metals disappear, but they find others.

And so on ad infinitum?

What "Liberty Star" is looking for in The Hay Mountain  in Arizona?

If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements.
What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit?

 

P.S. 15 October 2018. Today one person called me. He already contacted me for consultation in 2015, but then he decided that he could solve this issue on his own. He believed that the field "Hay Mountain" is the deposit of rare earth metals. 3 years have passed. Today, he asked for advice on copper-cobalt ores.

I wrote you "As a result, you will come to me with the last hope.with your so-called "mineral deposits" for my help to return to you at least part of your lost money. After all, except me, no one can really help you with the case... All others are just talking and promising."

On September 23, 2015 he wrote to me: "...which in turn contains porphyry copper associate metals including lead, zinc, molybdenum, potassium, manganese, vanadium occasional silver, uranium, vanadium and copper."

On June 23, 2016, he writes to me. "...Hay Mountain land package possesses commercially viable deposits of copper, molybdenum, gold, silver, lead, zinc, manganese and other metals including rare earth elements, uranium and thorium but data to date suggests it does."

July 24, 2017 they found cobalt.

On December 1, 2017 they wrote to me: "This summer we scanned for numerous elements and had positive results for silver, gold, cobalt, copper, molybdenum iron, nickel, lead, uranium, and zinc."

On December 14, 2017 they found only copper: "Hay Mountain (Cochise County, Arizona) is in fact a typical Paleozoic limestone hosted porphyry copper emanating from a quartz monzonitic stock indicated by our detailed geophysics."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Gladiolus: Top 10 posts out of 100

This is the 100th post in the blog "Gladiolus".

1.  One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE"  

2. The Chinese company XINHAI has created a website on my behalf. The site contains advertising of state company of Chile "CODELCO". I DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE MY NAME! 

3. They (Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, University of London, UK) do not know what apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE 

4. Top 10 articles in Linkedin for 2016

5.  THEY HACKED MY ACCOUNTS AGAIN

6.  One from CODELCO writes to me

7.  What is innovation in Russia?

8.  I'm not interested in working in an university group or other scientific group or a team

9.  I'm NOT A POLITICAL SCIENTIST. I'm studying a Physical World Map, not a Political World Map.

10a.  Christopher Ecclestone (Mining Strategist at Hallgarten & Company Ltd, London, UK) published two reports. My opinion.

10b. What "Liberty Star" is looking for in The Hay Mountain in Arizona?
 

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

You will not earn much on such ore

Invester asked: "One invites me to buy a deposit that contains vanadium, rhenium, platinum, paladium, uranium, molybdenum, copper and lead."

I replied: This is a very poor copper-molybdenum occurence. This is not what you need. You will not earn much on such ore."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

One writes to me: "Do you join our group if you are interested?"

One from Catholic University writes to me: "We are developing a deposit of REE and platinum. Do you join our group if you are interested?"

My answer to this proposal and the like: "No, I'm not interested in working in an university group or other scientific group or a team, in such groups there is usually a very blurred composition of their members and blurred responsibility for the final result of the project.
I'm not happy with the fact that I can not determine the final result in such cases, as a result it is very bad for any project, investor.
I work alone, I can do almost anything I need. I use to personally answer for the final result of my work.
Therefore, I do not need any bands, except my own little team.
If necessary, I myself will attract to my team on a temporary basis those who I need. "
 
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 

One from Antofagasta minerals writes to me: "Could you help us (collaboration)?"

One from Antofagasta minerals writes to me: "We have a problem with silicates in copper concentrate... Could you help us (collaboration)?

My answer: " I have technological solutions for this problem and the like.
The solutions are presented for sale on my website CONCENTRATION OF MINERALS
I am interested in the net sale of my technological solutions and I guarantee the high quality of my solutions.
I do not give advice on my technological solutions. It would be strange if I acted to the detriment of my interests.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 

One said me: "The only problem with the flotation Cu-Mo porphyry ores exist"

One said me: "The only problem with the flotation Cu-Mo porphyry ores exist - this pyrite flotation"

I said: "You are wrong.
Cu-Mo porphyry ore contains 65-75% silicates and only 1.5-5% pyrite.

A lot of the problems in the flotation of Cu-Mo porphyry ores exist:

• Flotation active silicates
• Swelling particles
• Adhering particles
• Flotation of pyrite and many others

I did the calculations: If you suppress only pyrite, then you have a copper concentrate with a copper content of 6-9%.
If you suppress only silicates, you have a copper concentrate with a copper content of 12-17%."

P.S.  I made this calculation 3 years ago. I am very advanced in solving the problems of flotation of porphyry ores. I created several solutions to fix these problems. "THE STORE OF MY IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS"

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

How to separate phosphate from carbonate?

They asked me very often: "How to separate phosphate from carbonate?"

My answer: "You need to ask a more specific question. What are the MINERALS that need to be separated?
Phosphate is a group of minerals, which includes more than 230 minerals. Carbonates are a group that includes more than 120 minerals."

If you have questions, you can visit "The consulting on concentration of minerals".  

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

This ore contains chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite. What risks?

One asked me: "Geologists have discovered a new site. This ore contains chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite. What risks?"

My answer: "The risks are very high. Geologists have made gross errors. Investors can lose a money with this occurrense".

P.S.: I made this forecast 1 year ago (in 2017). They have no solution so far.

What risks do you have at this stage?

The risks are very high. You risk losing up to several billion dollars and getting stuck for 10-20 years in anticipation of a miracle.

At best, you will be forced to build several costly plants to get at least some product. Your real incomes will be one order of magnitude lower than the incomes you expect.

In the worst case, you will not get any product. You lost your money.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE"

One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE, which content is 4-6%. Develop me a technology, please!"

I told him: "Firstly I would like to be sure that you have found the deposit, rather than granite quarry.
Later, he gave me the mineralogical composition of the ore. I was right. He found an apatite deposit. Usually, apatite is breed mineral.
This occurrence is not a REE deposit. Fertilizer is the maximum You can get."

P.S. A good mineral deposit is a rare find. Not every occurrence of minerals is a true mineral deposit.

For example, under the guise of REE deposits, they can sell an occurrence containing apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite and many others. Such “deposits” are unpromising for the production of REE.

From apatite you can get only mineral fertilizers. You can become an ordinary fertilizer producer, but you will never become a Rare Earth King.

You didn’t dream about this!

We can give a lot of such examples. We presented in the table only a few real examples:

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

I will use underground leaching. What do you think?

One geologist wrote to me: "I found deposit, it contains 70% of carbonate. I will use underground leaching. What do you think? "

I replied: "This is a very bad idea. You should not use underground leaching (In situ leaching (ISL)), as the carbonate content is more than 2%.
You can not use acid for leaching. You will get only water and carbon dioxide. Nothing more.
You will spoil the deposit."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 

What is the difference between me and others?

They ask me: "What is the difference between you and others?"

I answer: "I am making a strict calculation. Others are trying to guess."

© Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

I do not see this post in my news feed of Linkedin and I can not delete it.

I received a message from Linkedin that Daniel Valero Gutierrez published a post in my group.
I do not see this post in my news feed and I can not delete it.
This topic is not within the scope of our interests. I ask that this post be deleted.

 

Daniel Valero Gutierrez  wanted to publish this post too.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Why did not Linkedin like my publication? Why did Linkedin hide it from you?

Top 10 articles in Linkedin for 2016

You can read also

What does the freedom of speech mean for a scientist?
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Top 10 articles in Linkedin for 2017

1. CLASSIFICATION OF MINERALS CONTAINING SCANDIUM

2. Critical review to the article "Determination of average flotation rate constants on the results of testing"​

3. ELECTROFLOTACIÓN

4.  REBAJA DE PRESENCIA DE LOS SILICATOS

5, CLASSIFICATION OF MINERALS CONTAINING INDIUM

6. CLASSIFICATION OF MINERALS CONTAINING MOLYBDENUM

7. AUMENTO DE LOS BENEFICIOS DE Cu-Mo FLOTACIÓN

8, ENRICHMENT THEORY. Part 2. How to become a Metallurgical King

9. IN SITU LEACHING IS A MIRACLE OR A NEW ADVERTISING MOVE?

10. CLASIFICACIÓN DE LAS MÁQUINAS DE FLOTACIÓN

I published 43 articles in Linkedin in 2017. I think that this rating is not objective, since the Linkedin team moderated and strictly censored all my publications in 2017.


You can read also

What does the freedom of speech mean for a scientist?
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

What does the freedom of speech mean for a scientist?

Dear colleagues and friends!
 I draw your attention to the fact that all my accounts and e-mails are censored.
 If I do not answer you by email or in accounts, it means that I do not receive your letters and questions, or my answers are hidden.
 Virtually none of my accounts function properly.
Who does this and for what purpose? I do not know that.
 So when you come to my profile, it does not reflect the complete information about me and my work.
 Be careful!

You can read also

• Who hides my scientific publications? What Goal?

• Why do they delete my scientific articles and films in the Linkedin in my group "HOLLYWOOD & MINING"?

• I demand the abolition of censorship

• They do not block all my scientific statements in Linkedin, but selectively. This is censorship.

• Why do I work under strict censorship in Linkedin?

• Why do they hide from you scientific information in Linkedin?

• Who stole my scientific publications? I'll continue the search!

• I told you that they forbid me to criticize the Englishmen in Linkedin!

• Linkedin is fighting against science and scientists?

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Top 10 articles in Linkedin for 2016

I published 36 articles in Linkedin in 2016. I think that this rating is objective. These topics are the most popular on my sites too.

1. CLASSIFICATION OF FLOTATION MACHINES

2. HOW TO CHOOSE A METHOD FOR THE SEPARATION OF MINERALS

3. CLASIFICACIÓN DE LOS REACTIVOS DE FLOTACIÓN

4. CLASSIFICATION OF MINERALS CONTAINING REE

5. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS FOR RARE EARTH ELEMENTS. Part 1

6. CLASSIFICATION OF MINERALS ON THE MAGNETIC PROPERTIES

7. TEN SIGNS OF A SWINDLE

8. REBAJA DE PRESENCIA DE LOS SILICATOS PARA AUMENTAR LA LEY DE COBRE EN EL CONCENTRADO EN LAS PLANTAS

9. SELECTION OF METHODS FOR SEPARATING OF GOLD

10. PROSPECTIVE RARE METALS

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya