Thursday 30 November 2017

WHAT IS THE SECRET OF OUR SUCCESS?

Investors and owners often ask us: "WHAT IS THE SECRET OF YOUR SUCCESS?"

We answer: "The success or failure of the case is laid more on the level of ideas. Line up and solve the problem theoretically in the head, to simulate the situation before an investment - is to make 80 % of case. The rest is a technical matter. Our strong point and our trump card is a possibility to choose  theoretically the optimal processing technology for any ore.

We'll help you get rich!

Contact us directly. Don’t buy anything without our independent assessment - this is too risky. Don't succumb to cheap promises and simple solutions. Anything of these doesn't exist. Each step can lead you to great loss.

Remember that!
We will share with you the knowledge that any expert doesn't have in the world!

We know everything in the mineral enrichment. We have no competitors. Only we can theoretically calculate and simulate FOR YOU  the UNIQUE TECHNOLOGY, which anybody doesn't have in the world.
Hurry, because our small team may be busy again on another project, and you will have to wait.

Ph.D. Igor Bobin & Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya"

You can visit our website "CONCENTRATION OF MINERALS"  and read "OUR ADVICE TO OWNERS AND INVESTORS"

Tuesday 28 November 2017

Only people who are late for modern science, they measure and compare "flotation rate constants" today

This is a page MEI Blog. http://min-eng.blogspot.cl/2017/11/flotation-17-conference-diary.html
They write about "Flotation '17 Conference"
 

Claudio Schneider of CETEM, Brazil, presented the results of a campaign: "The measured FLOTATION RATE CONSTANTS do not vary with composition thus demonstrating bubble transport control."

My comment:

1. If we compare such modern mathematical tools and "flotation rate constant" then it is possible to draw an analogy with two cars: one of which has precise speedometer with recording of speed values (direct mapping of speed at any given time); another car has only a ribbon tied on the top of antenna by which you can indirectly judge the speed ("speed constant"). What car is better for you? Any comments are simply unnecessary.

To date, there are: universal equation of flotation kinetics and also formula for the direct calculation of the flotation velocity (rate) of Ph.D. Igor Bobin

These mathematical tools allow you to describe adequately the kinetics and dynamics of the flotation process. Thus you can see and use directly the current value of the flotation velocity at each time point.

2.  The density of the particles is not critical for flotation. It's not gravity separation. 

3. It's strange to me that they chose flotation, not traditional methods of separation. Maybe because he is cunning and the composition of the ore is much more complicated? 
http://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/142380/Quantifying-the-uncertainty.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Monday 27 November 2017

HOW CAN I GET SUPER-PROFIT IN MINING?

One investor asked me: "How can I get super-profit in mining?"

I answered  him: "We will help you to avoid unreasonable and useless costs even before a planning stage.
For big profits you need rare solutions, you need people who know the minerals, reagents, metals, mineral separation methods ...  Ask the expert to which you applied, how many ways of ore enrichment he knows? 2-5? He will build your future of these options. But can a prospective multimillionaire conclude a deal, having the presence of only 5 options? The answer is simple: “no”! He sees up to 100 variants to choose one!
We know hundreds of mineral separation methods, new modern machinery and reagents worldwide. We are not engaged by certain brands of equipment and reagents. We will offer you all the best in the world that can be found today."


You can visit our website "CONCENTRATION OF MINERALS"  and read "OUR ADVICE TO OWNERS AND INVESTORS"

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Thursday 23 November 2017

The Al-Farabi Kazakh National University has the grossest mistakes on its website

This is the page of the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University  http://www.kaznu.kz/ru/3403

They have gross errors.  They wrote that own minerals of indium contain thousandths of indium (Indite, Roquesite, Sakuraiite, Petrukite, Yixunite, Dzhalindite)! 


You can visit my site CONCENTRATION OF MINERALS. You will find reliable information about Indium.


Ph.D. Nartalia Petrovskaya

Tuesday 21 November 2017

You can help me to reduce the price, get a good discount?

One investor asked me: "I want to buy an ore deposit. I feel that the price is excessive, you can help me to reduce the price, get a good discount?"

I replied: "You are very well done, that appealed to me I can help you I can find a deposits defects that will allow you to significantly reduce its price, also i know how you can sell it more expensive. (legally)"


You can visit too "Express evaluation of technological feasibility of mineral extraction from the oredeposit for new sites"

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Wednesday 15 November 2017

One asked me: "What type of copper deposit do you recommend me to buy..."

One asked me: "I have a choice. What type of copper deposit do you recommend me to buy (sulphide or porphyry)? "

I answered: "Specifically in your case, I advise you to buy a sulphide deposit".

You can visit too "Express evaluation of technological feasibility of mineral extraction from the oredeposit for new sites"

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya
 

Tuesday 14 November 2017

Critical review to the article "Determination of average flotation rate constants on the results of testing"​

Critical review to the article "Determination of average flotation rate constants on the results of testing" of the author: Ph.D. Vladimir Z. Kozin. Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Russia. Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference "Scientific bases and practice of processing of ores and technogenic raw materials." May 21-26, 2007.

The purpose of the article is the author's desire to refute the well-known fact. To quote the author: "It is usually assumed that at the beginning of flotation when t→0 (flotation time), we can get almost monomineral concentrates. It turns out that this is not so."

Further, the author cited some calculations. He made a blunder, because he substituted incorrect values of parameters ​in the formula (content of the valuable component in the ore). As a result, V. Kozin got incorrect result and he made a false conclusion (look at the formula).
Thus, the Ph.D. Vladimir Z.  Kozin misled the scientific world and he replaced the calculations in order to prove his baseless theory.
Deliberately V. Kozin did it or accidentally, we don't know.

In practice of flotation, there are cases of production of a finished copper concentrate at the head of the process, the so-called "copper head". Thus, the "Kozin theory" belies the real facts and contradicts with flotation practice.

The author laments: "The real methods for determining the flotation rate constants don't exist." It is not true. Methods exist, but it is complex and useless.

Flotation rate constant is a fictional figure, is a half-measure. It doesn't allow to see the full picture of the process and it is practically useless. Its purpose is only to demonstrate the existence of some scientific results of routine experiments, in the absence of actual scientific findings, a real scientific novelty. It is time to stop this not a useful tradition.

Only people who are late for modern science, they measure and compare "flotation rate constants" today.

To date, there are: universal equation of flotation kinetics and also formula for the direct calculation of the flotation velocity (rate). These mathematical tools allow you to describe adequately the kinetics and dynamics of the flotation process. Thus you can see and use directly the current value of the flotation velocity at each time point.

If we compare such modern mathematical tools and "flotation rate constant" then it is possible to draw an analogy with two cars: one of which has precise speedometer with recording of speed values (direct mapping of speed at any given time); another car has only a ribbon tied on the top of antenna by which you can indirectly judge the speed ("speed constant"). What car is better for you? Any comments are simply unnecessary.

Thus, the need to identify "flotation rate constant" is disappeared.
I believe that the approach to the flotation kinetics as a study of "flotation rate constant" (or "flotation rate coefficients") is inefficient and outdated. Therefore, this V. Kozin's article doesn't present a scientific interest and practical.

On the contrary, this article is harmful, because it contains errors and false information. Many professionals may go by wrong way by reading this article.

By Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Linkedin

Monday 13 November 2017

One asked me: "Can I install the machines for Flash Flotation in the processing of porphyry ore in the head of circuits?"


One asked me: "Can I install the machines for Flash Flotation in the processing of porphyry ore in the head of circuits?"

I answered: "I do not recommend to  use Machines for Flash Flotation in the processing of porphyry ores.

If you install machines for Flash Flotation in the process of the head, then you significantly increase the  problems of silicates in the  concentrate.

Machines for Flash Flotation are machines narrow and special purpose.

For some ores they can be used, but not for porphyry ores."

 
You can visit my website "CONCENTRATION OF MINERALS" and read more about  FLOTATION MACHINES.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Sunday 12 November 2017

One said me: "The only problem with the flotation Cu-Mo porphyry ores exist - this pyrite flotation"

One said me: "The only problem with the flotation Cu-Mo porphyry ores exist - this pyrite flotation"

I said: "You are wrong. Cu-Mo porphyry ore contains 65-75% silicates and only 1.5-5% pyrite."

I did the calculations: "If you suppress only pyrite, then you have a copper concentrate with a copper content of 6-9%. If you suppress only silicates, you have a copper concentrate with a copper content of 12-17%."


I created several solutions to fix these problems.

You can visit "THE  STORE  OF  MY  IDEAS  AND  TECHNOLOGICAL  SOLUTIONS"


Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Thursday 9 November 2017

One from АUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY wrote

One from Australian University wrote that he conducted experiments with porphyry ore: "... this particular ore had no 'floating silicates'."

I answered: "I do not believe!"

Porphyry ores contain about 30% flotation active silicate , which have excellent flotation activity. These flotation active silicates floated much better and faster than sulfides. How does your model take into account this fact?

You want to say that that your porphyry ore does not contain any of the flotation active silicate?
Share your experience, where to find the porphyry ore, which does not contain flotation active silicate:  talc, pyrophyllite, steatite, chlorite, sericite, muscovite, biotite, phlogopite, Illit, kaolinite, bentonite, smectite, serpentine, hornblende, actinolite and many others

We also want to work with almost perfect ore!

I do not believe that your ore did not contain these minerals. Consequently, your work is a mistake, and the model is not adequate.
Good luck
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

P.S. I developed a "Classification of the silicates" according to their flotation properties in 2014. You can get acquainted with it.
 
P.S.S. Recently in 2017, I received a letter that they found silicates in copper concentrate at the "ANTOFAGASTA MINERALS".
 
That is, my "Classification of the silicates" is functioning.
 
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya
 

Wednesday 8 November 2017

One geologist wrote to me: "I found deposit, it contains 70% of carbonate..."

One geologist wrote to me: "I found deposit, it contains 70% of carbonate. I will use underground leaching. What do you think? "

I replied: "This is a very bad idea. You should not use underground leaching (In situ leaching (ISL)), as the carbonate content is more than 2%.
You can not use acid for leaching. You will get only water and carbon dioxide. Nothing more.
You will spoil the deposit."

P.S. I gave this advice to a geologist in 2015. They have not been able to do anything so far. That's why We reserve the right not to tackle the problem, if it belongs to the category of technically unsolvable problems (in the foreseeable future of 1-3 years) at the present level of technological development.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

You can also visit "The consulting on concentration of minerals"




Monday 6 November 2017

One from CODELCO writes to me

One from CODELCO (Chilean State Company) writes to me: "We are interested in buying a flotation machine of brand X. A similar machine is presented on your page. We would be grateful for the answer about the availability of equipment and the price."

I will answer: "I am not connected with the producers of concentrating equipment with any obligations, including with company X. Representation of company X there is in Santiago de Chile.
 
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Sunday 5 November 2017

One from "ANTOFAGASTA MINERALS" writes to me

One from Antofagasta minerals writes to me: "We have a problem with silicates in copper concentrate ... You have a lot of experience, an article on the site ... Could you help us (collaboration)?"

My answer: " I have technological solutions for this problem and the like. The solutions are presented for sale on my website https://sites.google.com/site/concentrationofminerals/services/the-store-of-my-ideas-and-technological-solutions. I am interested in the net sale of my technological solutions and I guarantee the high quality of my solutions. I do not give advice on my technological solutions. It would be strange if I acted to the detriment of my interests. And how about "collaboration" - see my previous post above.
 

Saturday 4 November 2017

One asked me: "The copper content in my plant has decreased to 0.55%..."

One asked me: "The copper content in my plant has decreased to 0.55%. Previously, the copper content was 0.7%. What do you advise me to do?"

I answered: "I can help you. You have to do a complete reconstruction of the plant, change the technology."

 

The difference between RAW MATERIALS (ore) and METAL exists!

The dumper with bauxite ore costs $ 108,000-540,000 (180 tons).
The dumper with aluminium costs $3,810,600 (180 tons).
The dumper with aluminum costs more than a dumper with bauxite ore.
The difference in cost is $ 3,702,600-3,270,600.
 

Thursday 2 November 2017

Placer deposits of ores containing REE

Placer deposits of rare-earth metals are the coastal sands, which are located along the shores of oceans, seas and rivers. The size of mineral particles is 0,07-0,2 mm (to 1 mm). Placers are occupied from hundreds of meters to tens of kilometers along the coast. The width of the placers is tens of meters (sometimes hundreds of meters). Seam Thickness is 2 meters (sometimes up to 10 meters).
 
Placer deposits of rare-earth metals are a traditional source of the REE production. Mining and processing of REE placer deposits are very developed throughout the world.
Today, due to the rapid development of technology, the extraction of marine placers is possible. There are special marine dredges. This is a very important point, because stocks of marine alluvial deposits are very large. In my opinion, the placer deposits can be considered as of the most promising feedstock for obtaining REE.

Placers are the complex raw materials and they contain:
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya Comparative analysis of various types of mineral raw materials for rare earth elements

Marine, coastal-marine and river placers containing REE there are:

  • Monazite (the monazite sand) in Australia, Brazil, India, the United States (Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina, Idaho, Virginia, Colorado), Malaysia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Mozambique, Thailand, China, Madagascar, Spain, France.
  • Xenotime in Australia, Malaysia, Thailand, Brazil, China.
  • Euxenite and fergusonite in the United States (Idaho) and China.
  • Eudialyte in the United States (Idaho).

To extract minerals from REE placers one can use environmentally friendly and cheaper technologies. Since the placers are small particles, there is no need to apply crushing and grinding.
Current and future processing schemes of placer minerals are included usually several ways of gravity separation of minerals to produce a collective concentrate (schlich, heavy concentrate). The tails of placer minerals don’t accumulate. The tails return to the ocean in a secure form (in the same form as the original raw material). Next may be used a combination of advanced methods of wet and dry separation of minerals. The schemes of REE ore processing may be different by sequence of operations depending on the mineral composition of placer. I would not recommended the use of flotation for the separation of REE placers due to the formation of harmful tailings. Today, there are environmentally friendly methods of mineral separation.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya Comparative analysis of various types of mineral raw materials for rare earth elements

The processing of placer deposits of REE has many advantages:

1. Processing of placer deposits of REE is produced by environmentally friendly technology without the use of any chemicals. Virtually no negative impacts on the flora and fauna of the ocean and coastal areas.

2. Processing of placer deposits decreases the radiation background at the shores of seas and oceans. The ecological situation is improving becourse radioactive minerals are removed from the beaches. Beaches become a beautiful light color.

3. Good working conditions without dust and chemical vapours.

4. Perhaps the complex use of raw materials and the obtaining of several concentrates, which increases profit.

5. The use of cheap technology.

6. Low cost of search and exploration of placer deposits. One deposit can be used for long time. Ocean continuously feeds new portions of raw materials without a limit.

7. There are no the costs for the construction of the quarry or mine.

8. Low construction costs for the processing plant. One floating plant – the marine dredge can be used for 50 years and more at the numerous placer deposits.

9. There are no the costs of crushing and grinding.

10. There are no the waste rock dumps, tailings containing hazardous and radioactive waste. There are no the costs for it.

11. There are no the costs of restoring the site.

12. Fresh water is not used. There are no the costs of preparation and purification of fresh water. Separation is made directly in seawater. Not any chemicals or minerals pollute the seawater.
The processing of placer deposits of REE has the following disadvantages:

1. Relatively low content of REE in placer ores. Recycling is economically viable only with preparation of several concentrates.

2. Relatively small ore reserves in the deposit field in the beach.

3. Some level of radioactivity of the monazite beaches. The basic mineral is monazite, which is due to the present of the radioactive thorium. Monazite sands of India (10% ThO2), Brazil (5% ThO2) Sri Lanka (20% ThO2) are more radioactive then others.

4. Monazite concentrate from placer deposits is also radioactive and requires additional safety measures.

5. Some REE manufacturers have refused to buy the monazite concentrate, since it produces a lot of  processing waste with thorium, which requires additional expenditure on storage.

6. Today they use the relatively primitive old technology at the processing of the alluvial REE ores. New equipment can allow obtaining additional concentrates simultaneously with the main, but it is not considered at the development of processing technologies now.
7. As a rule, they get heavy concentrate at the marine dredge, and the rest of the separation is produced on land. It is necessary to build deep-processing mineral plant at the shore (with new equipment and the promising technology, it is not needed).

8. The mining processes are significantly affected by weather conditions (storms, hurricanes and etc.), which complicate the work of the marine dredge or make it impossible at certain season.

9. Relatively small companies are involved at the development of the placer mining and processing; they don’t have a full cycle of REE processing. That is, they are produced and sold concentrates instead of metals. Concentrates are much cheaper than metal.

10. Typically, extraction of alluvial REE ores produced in the shallows, where the content of the components is not stable. Today, however, the placer mining is possible from the seabed at a depth large enough (on the shelf), there the content of valuable components is more stable and there are more reserves of ore.

11. There are not a sufficient number of specialists of the processing of alluvial REE deposits.

Development of marine placers are very promising direction. However each placer deposit has its own individual characteristics. Each REE ore must have its own individual technology. It is solution of tomorrow day.

The Investor asks me: "What will you advise me?"

The Investor asks me: "One man invites to buy a deposit that contains vanadium, rhenium, gold, platinum, palladium, uranium, molybdenum, copper, nickel, lead and REE. What will you advise me?"

I answered him: "According to your description, this is a very poor copper-molybdenum occurrence or shale occurrence. The development of such a project will take several decades. You will not be able to receive good dividends from this occurrence. This is not what you need."

You can visit too "Express evaluation of technological feasibility of mineral extraction from the oredeposit for new sites"

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Wednesday 1 November 2017

Why Scandium and Yttrium are not-strategic metals (according to Wikipedia)?

This is a trick question. They listed heavy metals with a density of more than 5 g /cm3.
Scandium and yttrium are light metals, so they are not listed. Scandium has a density of 3 g/cm3 and yttrium 4.5 g/cm3.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metals

You will receive answers to your questions here: "The consulting on concentration of minerals"