I have not received a single cent from you. Let the one who received money from you do it for you!

I systematically receive letters from unknown persons with illegal demanding to send my projects, my plans, my developments, my books, my classifications, our formulas and our other intellectual property. 

We are the only creators, developers and right-holders of our developments.

You didn’t pay me. You didn’t order any developments from me.

 I have not received a single cent from you.

 Let the one who received money from you do it for you!

•  WE ARE INDEPENDENT EXPERTS IN THE MINING.
• I did not sign 'Non-disclosure Agreement' (NDA). Never. With no one. 
• I did not sign any contracts.
• All my scientific products belong only to me. I did not give permission to use my name, my intellectual property, my articles, my sites, scientific achievements. Never. To nobody.
• I do not have intermediaries and obligations (neither written nor oral).
• We have no proxies, confidants, agents, envoys, lawyers, representatives, partners, intermediaries and etc.
• I am not affiliated with any companies, nor in any way.
• I am not interested in politics.
• I’m not looking for a job in any country.
• I’m not interested in positions in universities and companies.
•  I do not work with state corporations.
• I am completely free to cooperate with positive persons and companies from all over the world who want to really create new high technology and want to earn money with me.

 Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya and Ph.D. Igor Bobin

This is all a marketing slyness for naive investors and shareholders

In the ore processing, there are no "new", "newest" and "innovative" technologies for processing minerals today.  All currently used ore processing technologies have been well known for decades of years and hundreds.

Therefore, everything that is presented today by marketers as an "innovative cherry on the cake" is just a modernization and a combination of the well-known.

For example, they cut and roughly compile two or more well-known technologies, simply mechanically combine them, and offer this to investors under the guise of "innovative science-intensive products."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

One invites me to promote their technology

Gillian Daley (Senior and Executive Talent Recruiter: Technology & Professional Services - Promoting Women Leadership in Business, London, United Kingdom) invited me to promote their technology. More

I answered: "As far as I know, other kind of mills are traditionally used in the processing of sulfide ores. SAG mills are used in the processing of porphyry ores.
It's not entirely clear to me, where what is the novelty of the technology here? Maybe only a new Leadership?
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya"

The mining industry has long been in need of something significantly newer which will then be used for another 100 years or more. This is what I see as the main goal of my scientific activities and social and i do it on my own

Probably, I will not reveal a big secret if I tell the respected public such an inconvenient truth: In the mining, there are no "new", "newest" and "innovative" technologies for processing minerals today. This is all a marketing slyness for naive investors and shareholders.

 
All currently used ore processing technologies have been well known for decades of years and hundreds. Therefore, everything that is presented today by marketers as an "innovative cherry on the cake" is just a modernization and a combination of the well-known. For example, they cut and roughly compile two or more well-known technologies, simply mechanically combine them, and offer this to investors under the guise of "innovative science-intensive products." After all, "it has not exist before."

And all this is not done to improve production efficiency. Not at all! Production efficiency may even decrease. Nobody really cares about it. Their main task is to sell the same thing, but at a significantly higher price under an "innovative" sauce. I believe that old stuff should be worth the same old price.

As for me, the existing technologies for processing minerals have long been exhausted. Ores are becoming poorer, ores of complex composition are involved in processing, outdated processing methods, ineffective reagents are used. No matter how you modernize old technologies, it will not become new. All of this would have been great 100 years ago, but not now.

The mining industry has long been in need of something significantly newer, really new processing technologies, which will then be used for another 100 years or more. This is what I see as the main goal of my scientific activities and social and I do it on my own.

I'm not interested in deceiving people and selling  old stuff to them at exorbitant prices.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

 

ABOUT INVESTMENTS by Natalia Petrovskaya

Dear friends.
You offer me to develop a business in my country.
But, what country are we talking about? What does “my country” mean?
I am a man of the world, cosmopolitan. I am out of politics. I feel myself so. For me, all countries are mine.

See my diagram. Criteria of Petrovskaya: metals – minerals – deposits – technologies. Where is no the country, the state.

I look and choose only minerals and deposits. But not  countries. I can choose the best deposit, equipment, reagents, create  technology and get profit.
As for the political system, stability, etc., you decide which country is best for you business, I am not a politician.

As a person who is responsible and honest, I can tell you  frankly that I will not vouch for anyone (person, team, enterprise …).  I  am confident only in myself.

Therefore, if we are talking about relatively small investments (about USD 10-20 millions), then I can recommend you to invest in me, this is the most reliable investment.

So, my business plan is an investment in me and under my name. Then  we decide what is best for you, we can determine in detail the larger  investments (under USD 1 billion and more): where and how to do it  better. To determine this, I need to work hard and count.

No one (except the scammer) can tell you reliably on the fly: “Now this is the right thing to do! Invest only there!”

All the available information about the object, calculations and experience are needed to say this.
Hurry up, because I may be busy in another project very soon.
Respectfully,

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya, 2018

We do not have intermediaries. You can contact us directly

In connection with the unhealthy interest and aggressive hunting of a number of countries and large companies to my science-intensive products, there is no a privacy of my correspondence in e-mail and social networks.


For serious negotiations, you can use the Telegram Secret Chat here
https://t.me/Ph_D_Natalia_Petrovskaya
https://t.me/Ph_D_Igor_Bobin
(it is better to use only this type of communication in all cases).

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya & Ph.D. Igor Bobin

GOODBYE, UNIVERSITIES!

You often ask me: "Why do not you want to work in an academic environment at the university of some country?"

I answer: "It's true. I really do not want this. I do not want to participate in Lie! Therefore, I do not want to work in an academic environment.
I'm an independent scientist!"

I do not take judging about the scope of scientific knowledge from which I am far. However, what they (academic science) write in their articles about my whole area of the mineral processing, this is a complete nightmare and ignorance. I read the articles in different languages and I am horrified. These "scientists" do not even understand what they write. Most of them simply rewrite other mistakes and misconceptions. This is not science. If there are guides, then the processing of minerals is in a steep peak. The poor Earth Climate will not take away this ignorance. 
 This is not my way.

Academic community seeks to score each scientist a label of the country, scientific school or university: "If a scientist  reached any scientific heights, this is not his merit, but it means that his country (which of them?) is such a "great" and "wise" (scientific school or university too). This is not discussed! In their opinion, the personal merit of the scientist does not exist without THE MERIT OF THE UNIVERSITY. So the delegations go to establish academic exchanges. Agreements on intent are signed. They appoint official "teachers" and "disciples" of this scientific genius, so that these official "teachers" and "disciples" sign any fraudulent contracts and projects without reading. The lie is multiplied.
But I do not want to participate in this lie! 

I do not have any teachers or disciples! I was taught only on basics of sciences as well as thousands of others students. I reached my wisdom by self-knowledge! And I did not give to anyone the depth of my knowledge, I did not teach anyone. Everyone who calls himself as my disciple (or teacher) - is the IMPOSTER.

We are cosmopolitans!  

We work for all of humanity, not for a country or a university. We are working independently for many years.   We are in us self. Do not associate us with some country, scientific school or university!

They do not own our knowledge; they do not have the authorship in our inventions and our know-how. Several countries and universities try to attribute our merit to its self. But they do not have anything, except their positions and rights of the signature in their  university and their country.
We are not serfs! We do not belong to them as the results of our work too! 


They can not create anything  really working, but only counterfeit and only on paper.

The role of personality in science is strongly underestimated. This is one of the distributed mistakes of our time.

I'm reading the academic scientific articles, I see that they contain a huge number of errors and deception. I do the comments, but they persistently rewrite the lie from each other and a lie is multiplying.
I feel myself as "Gelsomino in the country of liars".

We try to follow principles of  Real Scientist, one of which is NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LIE. 

I do not want to participate in Lie! Therefore, I do not want to work in an academic environment.
I'm an independent scientist!

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya
    
References
1.    Igor Bobin, Natalia Petrovskaya WHY ARE WE DOING PERSONAL RESEARCH? More
2.    A. Solzhenitsyn “Living not according to a lie”

You feel a pity for to stop it all, because you have already given the contractor a lot of money

   Excerpt from the article "TEN  SIGNS  OF  A  SWINDLE"

Assume that you are an owner or a manager of mining and metallurgical Plant, and you have a need to solve some complex technical problem (to develop a project of a new Plant, a new technology, to optimize the processes, to change the equipment, software, etc.). You can't do it yourself, because you don't have experts. By an advice of friends you are accessing to the mediation company offering engineering services and much other. "They will help me for sure here! It's all so serious, it's almost a ministry!" Maybe so. But you should not relax. After all, only you are interested in a solution of your problem. All others are only interested in your money and no one is going to save your money. That's for sure!

However, enough the presence of the following features to recognize an unscrupulous contractor: 

Bubble. Under various pretexts, Contractor is actively trying to attract to the implementation of the project as much as possible quantity of performers and subcontractors (often from different countries).
He also clearly justifies the need to divide the project into numerous intermediate parts and sub-parts. Contractor justifies the need for a large quantity of experiments, analysis, tests, consultations.
Why? Indeed, in this case, it is much easier to justify the exaggerated budget of the project and to dilute responsibility for the final result. Who is a culpable, that it didn't work? Immediately one could not tell it. "It's been a part of the project, and it is made with quality! Let's look at a new project, all these things can be improved!"

And your looting continues. 

The worse the work is done, the more contractor earns with additional services to further improve of some things. 

And you feel a pity for to stop it all, 
because you have already given the contractor a lot of money.

Free download of article  "TEN  SIGNS  OF  A  SWINDLE" in pdf

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

The investor asks me: "Help me get back at least some of my investment!" FORGET ABOUT THE MONEY SPENT!

From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."  

The investor asks me: "I bought a mineral deposits. Five years have passed. Many research laboratories in the world have done experiments. No one can get anything. Do at least something! I've already spent a lot of money. Help me return at least part of the money invested."

I always start with a theoretical analysis of the ore. This is my know-how. I am the only specialist in the world who does this. More

I made calculations and told the investor: "Forget about the money spent and this field. Now you have spent millions and have no result.
You can spend another 20 years and spend billions and you won't have results either."

And only that man, who is wise, will come to me today to get advice before investing.  
 
This is your money! You choose! 

You can do "Assessing Investment Risks in Mining".


Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Barrick Gold has an overrun of US $ 8 billion on The Plant "PASCUA-LAMA" (Chile) that they have not been able to build for 20 years? ? It's true?

From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."   

Plant project "PASCUA-LAMA" (Chile, Argentina)
 
Owners: 100 % Barrick Gold Corp. (Canada)

Barrick Gold has an overrun of US $ 8 billion on The Plant  "PASCUA-LAMA" (Chile)  that they have not been able to build for 20 years? ? It's true?
Barrick Gold plant "PASCUA-LAMA" in Chile has not produced a single ounce of gold or silver for 20 years.


Mark Bristow, CEO said:  "Barrick Gold owes:

• US $ 443 million to the Treasury of Chile, plus $ 340 million in interest.
• US $ 253 million to the Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (amount as of December 31, 2018)

All these obligations are added to the amount Barrick actually disbursed in a project "PASCUA-LAMA" that in its beginnings, almost 20 years ago, cost about US $ 950 million, but which ended with an overrun of over US $ 8 billion."

 Where was the money spent?

 IMHO, The copper and gold content of the ore is very low. It is lower than the outboard content on some mine.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

  References

1.  https://www.elmostrador.cl/mercados/2019/02/15/barrick-gold-devolvera-783-millones-de-dolares-al-estado-chileno-por-suspension-de-pascua-lama/
2.  https://miningdataonline.com/property/165/Pascua-Lama-Project.aspx
3.  https://www.barrick.com/English/home/default.aspx
4.  https://ejatlas.org/conflict/proyecto-de-oro-y-cobre-cerro-casale-aldebaran-chile

DEMAGOGUE

  Excerpt from the article "TEN  SIGNS  OF  A  SWINDLE"
 
Assume that you are an owner or a manager of mining and metallurgical Plant, and you have a need to solve some complex technical problem (to develop a project of a new Plant, a new technology, to optimize the processes, to change the equipment, software, etc.). You can't do it yourself, because you don't have experts. By an advice of friends you are accessing to the mediation company offering engineering services and much other. "They will help me for sure here! It's all so serious, it's almost a ministry!" Maybe so. But you should not relax. After all, only you are interested in a solution of your problem. All others are only interested in your money and no one is going to save your money. That's for sure!

However, enough the presence of the following features to recognize an unscrupulous contractor: 
 
Demagogue. Contractor avoids direct discussion of technical substance of the draft. 

He avoids direct answers to your pressing technical questions. He is masked under common arcane phrases, buzz words, pseudo-scientific formulations. "This is a very complicated electrochemical process! I can explain it to you, but it is excessively difficult and it takes a lot of time. You will not understand..."

You can't win him in discuss. It's impossible! He is a sophist!

Most likely, this man and his team are technically incompetent, they don’t understand the essence of your problem.

 Free download of article  "TEN  SIGNS  OF  A  SWINDLE" in pdf

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

Gladiolus: Top 40 posts out of 700

1. INVESTMENT IN ME IS THE MOST RELIABLE INVESTMENT!  (26 March 2019) More

2. Do I need to economize on flotation? NO!  (13 November 2018) More 

3. I did not give the permission to use my scientific achievements. Never and no one  (6 April 2019) More

4. I DESERVE THE BEST! I CAN CHOOSE!  (24 April 2019) More 

5. You need my "Mineral Benefication Information System" and "Petrovsky's Matrix"  (5 February 2019) More

6. For me, it's not news that the USGS does not distinguish minerals from metals. Why didn't anyone tell them about that for 100 years?  (21 February 2018) More 

7. I didn't ask you to take away our only means of livelihood (28 December 2018) More

This is one of my most popular publications. Why do they delete this publication systematically? Why don't they like this  publication?

8. Top 10 of the WORST REPORTS  (24 June 2018) More

9. Who deleted the drawing from my post about pine oil?  (19 December 2018) More

This is one of my most popular publications. Why do they delete this publication systematically? Why don't they like this  publication?

10. To whom will you sell iron concentrate with a high content of silicates? (29 April 2018) More

11. "AGENCY OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION" doesn't know that lithium, tantalum and niobium are not rare-earth metals (4 December 2017) More

12. Do American banks continue to pursue me? (30 April 2019) More

13. I buy mineral deposit for myself, so I only consider my opinion (29 January 2019) More

This is one of my most popular publications. Why do they delete this publication systematically? Why don't they like this  publication?

14. If I use XRF to the golf course, possibly I will find more than 30 chemical elements. What do you think, can this golf course be a mineral deposit?  (18 February 2018) More 

This is one of my most popular publications. Why do they delete this publication systematically? Why don't they like this  publication?

15. THEY HACKED MY ACCOUNTS AGAIN (11 January 2018) More 

16. How could the minerals remain in the slag after smelting?  (14 December 2018) More

17. Always be convinced with what Natalia Petrovskaya you are dealing!   (19 October 2018) More

18. They in Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment don't know the difference between minerals, metals, rocks, mineral groups, metal groups and so on  (4 April 2018) More  

19. YOU DESERVE THE BEST! YOU CAN CHOOSE! (15 September 2018) More

20. I did not create this profile in TWEETCS. Who did it?  (14 January 2018) More  

21. Investment in me is the most reliable investment! (21 December 2018) More 

22. INNOVATOR  (9 August 2018) More

23. WE ARE COSMOPOLITAN! (24 October 2018) More

24. The Chinese company XINHAI has created a website on my behalf. The site contains advertising of state company of Chile "CODELCO". I DID NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE MY NAME! (14 January 2018) More 

25. I did not give permission to use my name, my intellectual property, my articles, my sites (12 September 2018) More

26. The mediators between us are a needless links  (7 October 2018) More 

27. Why Scandium and Yttrium are not-strategic metals (according to Wikipedia)? (1 November 2017) More

28. BEING MINERAL OR NOT IS IMPORTANT!!! (10 November 2017) More   

29. One geologist told me: "I've found a deposit of REE"  (11 February 2018) More

30. They (Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, University of London, UK) do not know what apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE (8 January 2018)  More

31. THE SEARCH  (2 April 2018) More

32. Assessing Investment Risks in Mining (16 August 2018) More

33. USGS will not be able to create a "scanning system of the future" never  (21 June 2018) More

34. Are the US banks chasing me again?  (5 October 2019) More 

35. I'm not interested in working in an university group or other scientific group or a team (24 January 2018) More 

36. University's applied science. How it works. Why do you need to pay them all, if only one will real work?  (12 December 2018) More

37. I believe my correct calculations, but I don’t believe 100 likes  (6 October 2018) More 

38. I WAS THE BROKER BAIT (17 November 2018) More

39. They must collect a lot of likes for bad reports and bad articles to prove the opposite  (6 October 2018) More 

40. WHAT IS THE SECRET OF OUR SUCCESS? (30 November 2017) More

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

The Japanese company Sumitomo Metal Mining (SMM), which owns a 31.5% stake in the Chilean copper mine Sierra Gorda, lost about $1.35 billion from the depreciation of this asset in 2017/2018? It's true?

 From the series of publications 

"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."

KGHM "SIERRA GORDA (SCM)" (Chile)

Owners: 
KGHM International 55 % (Poland)
Sumitomo Metal Mining 31,5 % (Japan)
Sumitomo Corporation 13,5 % (Japan)

The Japanese company Sumitomo Metal Mining (SMM), which owns a 31.5% stake in the Chilean copper mine Sierra Gorda, lost about $1.35 billion from the depreciation of this asset in 2017/2018? It's true?

  Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 References

1. https://www.ukrrudprom.com/news/Dobicha_medi_v_CHili_stanovitsya_vse_bolee_ubitochnoy_dlya_novic.html
2.  https://www.metalinfo.ru/ru/news/102039
3.  http://www.sgscm.cl/es/nosotros
4. https://www.smm.co.jp/E/news/release/uploaded_files/20190829_E.pdf
5.  https://kghm.com/en/our-business/projects-under-development/sierra-gorda-oxides

The Plant "Minera Escondida" in Chile produced 266,794 tons of metallic copper in 2018, but not 1,242,687 tons of copper

From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."   

Plant "Minera Escondida" (Chile)

Owners:
57.5 % BHP Billiton (Australia)
30 % Rio Tinto (UK)
10 % JECO Corp. (Japon)
2.5 % International Finance Corp. (USA)

In 2018, The Plant "Minera Escondida" in Chile produced 266794 tons of copper cathode (metallic copper), which the owners can sell on the exchange.

Let's count:
How many tons of copper each owner can sell at the exchange price:

57.5 % BHP Billiton (Australia) - 153407 tons of copper cathode;
30 % Rio Tinto (UK)  - 80038 tons of copper cathode;
10 % JECO Corp. (Japon) - 26679 tons of copper cathode;
2.5 % International Finance Corp. (USA) - 6670 tons of copper cathode.

The Plant "Minera Escondida" produced 975893 tons of copper concentrate in 2018, too. Copper concentrate from The Plant "Minera Escondida (Chile) is an intermediate product that is cheap and requires further processing and significant financial costs. The concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals. 
The Plant "Minera Escondida" does not produce either gold or silver.

 Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

  References

1. http://www.nuevamineria.com/revista/ganancia-neta-de-escondida-se-dispara-mas-de-40-durante-el-2018/
2. https://miningdataonline.com/property/147/Escondida-Mine.aspx
3. https://www.portalminero.com/wp/minera-escondida-registra-menor-produccion-de-cobre-y-ganancias-caen-un-20-por-ciento-entre-enero-y-septiembre/
4. https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/mapa-minero/minera-escondida/
5. https://www.imercados.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019-07-14-BHP-Informe-de-Sustentabilidad-2018-Minera-Escondida-Pampa-Norte.pdf
6. http://www.guiaminera.cl/minera-escondida-ltda/

The plant LOS BRONCES (The flotation plant Las Tórtolas, Chile) produces copper concentrate but not copper, molybdenum concentrate but not molybdenum

From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."

 
The plant LOS BRONCES (Chile) 
 
  Owners:  
Anglo American plc  50,1 %  (UK)  
JV Codelco-Mitsui 29,5% (Chile, Japan)
Mitsubishi Corp. 20,4% (Japan)

The plant Los Bronces (The flotation plant Las Tórtolas, Chile) produces copper concentrate but not copper, molybdenum concentrate but not molybdenum. The concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metal.
Copper concentrate from the plant Los Bronces (Chile) is an intermediate product that is cheap and requires further processing and significant financial costs.
Copper concentrate and molybdenum concentrate are sent to the Chagres Smelter (or others Metallurgical Plant).

 Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 References

1. https://chile.angloamerican.com/es-ES/operaciones/los-bronces
2. https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/socios/anglo-american/
3. https://chile.angloamerican.com/es-es/operaciones#/projects-operations-offices-headquarters/diamonds-copper-platinum-coal
4.  https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/mapa-minero/los-bronces/
5.  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj9-ZTlzdDqAhW_ErkGHfPZBB8QFjAQegQIBhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.u-cursos.cl%2Fingenieria%2F2010%2F1%2FME56B%2F1%2Fmaterial_docente%2Fbajar%3Fid_material%3D286533&usg=AOvVaw1fbuQei2HK0hrCU9vukbG8
6.  https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/mapa-minero/chagres/

The plant El Soldado (Chile) produces copper concentrate, but not copper

From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."

The plant El Soldado (Chile)
 
Owners:  
Anglo American plc  50,1 %  (UK)
JV Codelco-Mitsui 29,5% (Chile, Japan)
Mitsubishi Corp. 20,4% (Japan)

The plant El Soldado (Chile) produces copper concentrate, but not copper. The concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metal.
Copper concentrate  from the plant El Soldado (Chile) is an intermediate product that is cheap and requires further processing and significant financial costs.

 Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 References

1.  https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/mapa-minero/el-soldado/
2.  https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/socios/anglo-american/
3.  https://www.codelco.com/codelco-y-mitsui-forman-un-joint-venture-para-obtener-el-29-5-de-anglo/prontus_codelco/2012-08-23/083330.html
4.  https://www.angloamerican.com/~/media/Files/A/Anglo-American-Group/PLC/media/presentations/2019pres/chile-copper-oct-2019.pdf
5.  https://www.sernageomin.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Libro_Anuario_2018_.pdf

NEWMONT GOLDCORP - TECK "NuevaUnión" (Chile) does not produce neither copper, nor gold, nor molybdenum.

From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."

NEWMONT GOLDCORP - TECK "NuevaUnión" (Chile)

Owners:  
Newmont Goldcorp, 50 %  (USA)
Teck 50 %, (Canada)

IMHO,  NEWMONT GOLDCORP - TECK "NuevaUnión" (Chile) does not produce neither copper, nor gold, nor molybdenum.
NEWMONT GOLDCORP - TECK "NuevaUnión" (Chile) produces copper concentrate and molybdenum concentrate. The concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals.

IMHO: This is not copper, gold and molybdenum which you can sell on the exchange!
Copper concentrate  from the plant NEWMONT GOLDCORP - TECK "NuevaUnión" (Chile)  is an intermediate product that is cheap and requires further processing and significant financial costs.

NEWMONT GOLDCORP - TECK "NuevaUnión" (Chile) promise to get 224000 tons per year of copper in concentrate.

IMHO.  It is not true. The maximum amount of copper (theoretically possible) that they can extract from their ore is 147440 tons per year of copper in concentrate. More

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

  References
https://www.mch.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2020/01/MCH463_digital-1.pdf
 https://mineriaenlinea.com/2020/02/newmont-y-teck-invertiran-152-millones-en-proyecto-chileno-de-cobre-y-oro/

Imagine that you can predict the financial catastrophe of a mining enterprise or its success is much more early (10-20 years before this event)!?

He persuades you to buy a occurrence:  "The deposit contains rare earth metals, gold, silver, copper, iron, titanium, vanadium, nickel, lead, tin ..."

You decided: "I buy!"

Several decades passed.  You invested several billion dollars.

You did not receive bullion of gold or silver, ingots of rare earth metals,  copper, iron, titanium, vanadium, nickel, lead, tin.

But don't despair!
 
With the advent of "Assessment of investment risks in mining according to Petrovsky's criteria", you can already know the development of events for several decades ahead.

We do not have intermediaries. You can contact us directly:
benefication@protonmail.ch
mineral.modeling@protonmail.com
https://t.me/Ph_D_Natalia_Petrovskaya

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

CANDELARIA MINING COMPLEX (Chile) does not produce neither copper, nor gold, nor silver

 From the series of publications

"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" -

"They draw up the necessary documents

and begin to search for the simpleton..."

CANDELARIA MINING COMPLEX (Chile)

Owners:  

Lundin Mining Corp. 80 % (Canada)
 Sumitomo 20 % (Japan)

CANDELARIA MINING COMPLEX (Chile) does not produce neither copper, nor gold, nor silver.

CANDELARIA MINING COMPLEX produces copper concentrate, nothing more. A concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals.

IMHO, It’s not true that "The mining company reported that between July and September (2019) this mine produced 40698 tons of copper, along with approximately 24,000 oz of gold and 355,000 oz of silver."

 IMHO: Copper concentrate  from CANDELARIA MINING COMPLEX (Chile)  is an intermediate product that is cheap and requires further processing and significant financial costs.
 This is not copper, gold and silver which you can sell on the exchange!

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

References

1. https://www.miningglobal.com/miningsites/report-freeport-mcmoran-sell-candelaria-copper-mine-chile
2. https://www.distritocandelaria.cl/proceso-productivo/
3. https://miningdataonline.com/property/144/Candelaria-Mine.aspx#Production
4. https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/socios/lundin-mining-corporation/
5. https://www.mch.cl/2019/10/28/candelaria-proyecta-producir-145-000-155-000-ton-de-cobre-este-ano/
6. http://www.iimch.cl/index.php/noticias2/actualidad/883-canadiense-lundin-mining-compra-mina-de-cobre-candelaria-a-freeport-mcmoran
7.  https://www.lundinmining.com/site/assets/files/7461/lundin_mining_-_candelaria_copper_mining_complex_-_investor_analyst_site_visit_-_sept_2018.pdf

The plant Antofagasta Minerals "LOS PELAMBRES" (Chile) does not produce a single ton of copper, and according to their information is "We are among the first 5 copper producers in Chile". How is this possible?

From the series of publications

"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" -

"They draw up the necessary documents

and begin to search for the simpleton..."

 Antofagasta Minerals "LOS PELAMBRES" (Chile)

 Owners: 

 
Antofagasta Minerals 60% (Chile)
Nippon LP Investment 25% (Japan)
MM LP Holding BV 15% (Japan)
(Antofagasta Minerals, Nippon Mining & Metals, Mitsubishi  Materials, Marubeni y Mitsubishi Corp.)

The plant Antofagasta Minerals "LOS PELAMBRES" (Chile) does not produce a single ton of copper, and according to their information is "We are among the first 5 copper producers in Chile". How is this possible?

The plant Antofagasta Minerals "Los Pelambres" (Chile) does not produce neither copper, nor molybdenum, nor gold or silver.
The plant Antofagasta Minerals "Los Pelambres" produces copper concentrates and molybdenum concentrates, nothing more. A concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 References

1. https://www.aminerals.cl/que-hacemos/nuestras-companias/chile/minera-los-pelambres/
2. http://web.pelambres.cl/
3.  https://gladiolus1.blogspot.com/

COMPAÑÍA MINERA DOÑA INÉS DE COLLAHUASI (Chile) does not produce a single ton of copper and, according to their information, is "among the six main copper producers in the world". How is this possible?

 From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."

COMPAÑÍA MINERA DOÑA INÉS DE COLLAHUASI (Chile)

Owners:
Anglo American plc (44%), (UK)
Glencore (44%), (Switzerland)
Japan Collahuasi Resources B.V. (12%), consorcio integrado por Mitsui & Co., Nippon Mining & Metals Co. y Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., (Japan)

IMHO, COMPAÑÍA MINERA DOÑA INÉS DE COLLAHUASI (Chile) does not produce a single ton of copper and, according to their information, is "among the six main copper producers in the world". How is this possible?

COMPAÑÍA MINERA DOÑA INÉS DE COLLAHUASI (Chile) produces copper concentrate and molybdenum concentrate, nothing more. A concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals.

For example, in 2015, COMPAÑÍA MINERA DOÑA INÉS DE COLLAHUASI (Chile) produced 22200 tons of cathode copper.
It seems to me that this is not enough to become "the main copper producers in the world".

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

 References
https://www.mch.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2020/01/MCH463_digital-1.pdf
https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/socios/collahuasi/
http://www.collahuasi.cl/que-hacemos/produccion-y-ventas/
https://miningdataonline.com/property/1383/Collahuasi-Mine.aspx

Antofagasta Minerals produced 136150 tons of cathode copper in Chile in 2019 (taking into account the shares of its partners)?

From the series of publications

"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" -

"They draw up the necessary documents

and begin to search for the simpleton..."

 IMHO, in 2019, "Antofagasta Minerals" together with partners produced 211100 tons of cathode copper in Chile.
Antofagasta Minerals produced 136150 tons of cathode copper in Chile in 2019 (taking into account the shares of its partners).
It seems to me that this is not enough for world's largest copper producer.


Antofagasta Minerals "LOS PELAMBRES" (Chile)

 Owners:
Antofagasta Minerals 60% (Chile)
Nippon LP Investment 25% (Japan)
MM LP Holding BV 15% (Japan)
(Antofagasta Minerals, Nippon Mining & Metals, Mitsubishi  Materials, Marubeni y Mitsubishi Corp.)

The plant Antofagasta Minerals "Los Pelambres" (Chile) does not produce neither copper, nor molybdenum, nor gold or silver.
The plant Antofagasta Minerals "Los Pelambres" produces copper concentrates and molybdenum concentrates, nothing more. A concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals.


Antofagasta Minerals "CENTINELA" (Chile)

Owners:
Antofagasta Minerals 70% (Chile)
Marubeni Corporation 30% (Japan)

The plant Antofagasta Minerals  "Centinela" (Chile) produced 81100 tons of copper cathodes in 2019. The rest is copper concentrates and molybdenum concentrates, which are not copper or molybdenum.


Antofagasta Minerals "ANTUCOYA" (Chile)

Owners:
Antofagasta Minerals 70% (Chile)
Marubeni Corporation 30% (Japan)

The plant Antofagasta Minerals  "Antucoya" (Chile) produced 71900  tons of copper cathodes in 2019.


Antofagasta Minerals "ZALDIVAR" (Chile)

Owners:
Antofagasta Minerals 50% (Chile)
Barrick Gold Corp. 50% (Canada)

The plant Antofagasta Minerals  "Zaldívar" (Chile) produced 58100 tons of copper cathodes in 2019.

 Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

   References

1. https://www.aminerals.cl/que-hacemos/nuestras-companias/chile/minera-los-pelambres/
2. http://web.pelambres.cl/
3. https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/socios/antofagasta-minerals/
4. https://miningdataonline.com/property/1380/Centinela-(Esperanza)-Mine.aspx#Production
5. http://web.antucoya.cl/que-hacemos/nuestras-companias/chile/minera-antucoya/

It’s not true that The Plant "Minera Escondida" in Chile produced 1,483 million tonnes of copper in 2007. The plant produced 124000 tons of copper

 From the series of publications 
"So they create a fairy tales for the investor" - 
"They draw up the necessary documents
and begin to search for the simpleton..."

 Plant "Minera Escondida" (Chile)

Owners:
57.5 % BHP Billiton (Australia)
30 % Rio Tinto (UK)
10 % JECO Corp. (Japon)
2.5 % International Finance Corp. (USA)

"Mr Diego Hernandez president of Billiton Base Metals told Reuters during a televised (07 Apr 2008) that... Escondida produced 1,483 million tonnes of the red metal last year..."

It’s not true that The Plant "Minera Escondida" in Chile  produced 1,483 million tonnes of copper in 2007.  

The  Plant "Minera Escondida" in Chile produced 124000 tons of copper in 2007.  

IMHO: The remaining 1,359 million tons are stones, sand, minerals containing copper, but they are not metallic copper. They call it "copper concentrate", "fine copper contained in concentrate", "cobre fino contenido en concentrado"...

They wrote on the BHP website that "Escondida mine is the world's largest copper producer".

The Plant "Minera Escondida" in Chile produces 120-350 kt of copper cathode.The remaining million tons are stones, sand, minerals, but not copper. 

IMHO: This is not enough to become "the world's largest copper producer".

The Plant "Minera Escondida" does not produce either gold or silver, but copper concentrate and copper cathode. Copper concentrate from The Plant "Minera Escondida (Chile) is an intermediate product that is cheap and requires further processing and significant financial costs. The concentrate is stones, sand, minerals, but not metals.

 Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 

  References

1.  https://www.bhp.com/media-and-insights/image-gallery/locations-and-operations/escondida-chile/
2.  https://steelguru.com/steel/bhpb-escondida-copper-mine-exploring-to-extend-life/41457
3.  https://www.mining-technology.com/projects/escondida/
4.  https://www.feller-rate.com/general2/corporaciones/escondida0711.pdf
5.  https://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/base-metals-investing/copper-investing/3-largest-copper-mines-in-the-world/
6. https://web.archive.org/web/20090209051913/http://www.escondida.cl/mel/en/news/2008/21_05_Febrero2008.asp
7. https://consejominero.cl/quienes-somos/socios/bhp/
8. https://www.bhp.com/media-and-insights/news-releases/2016/04/con-inauguracion-de-tercera-planta-concentradora-escondida-celebro-25-anos-de-operaciones/
9. https://earthshots.usgs.gov/earthshots/node/58#ad-image-1-0
10. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/international-minerals-statistics-and-information#ci
11.  https://miningdataonline.com/property/147/Escondida-Mine.aspx
12.  http://www.guiaminera.cl/minera-escondida-ltda/
13.   https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/600189/principales-minas-de-cobre-a-nivel-mundial/
14.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escondida
15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minera_Escondida
16.  https://steelguru.com/steel/bhpb-escondida-copper-mine-exploring-to-extend-life/41457
17.  https://www.mining.com/featured-article/ranked-worlds-top-copper-mines/
18.  https://www.sernageomin.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Libro_Anuario_2018_.pdf
19.  http://accionempresas.cl/docs/empresas