They must collect a lot of likes for bad reports and bad articles to prove the opposite

Damian Connelly Principal Consulting Engineer at METS Engineering Group (METS), Australia) wrote "CDMS DESIGNS FOR WET STICKY CLAY ORES"

I wrote to him: "Hello, Damian Connelly. Thank you for sharing. I found this article strange and contradictory. In one place you write that there are problems with the use of cyclones. However, in another place you recommend them to use. You are not familiar with the dry method of stacking and storing tails? This problem is solved, but you do not know about it? What minerals do clays consist of? What do you think?" He did not answer.

Robert Seitz  (Phoenix, Arizona, US) wrote a comment on the publication: "Good summary with mention of a selection of solutions. This is a starting point for those trying to comprehend issues and develop solutions. Thanks."

I wrote to Robert Seitz:   "Hi, Robert Seitz. What problem did he raise or decide? This is all known things. He rewrote the mistakes of other people. I'm interested to know how much changes the viscosity of the pulp during flotation. How much should the mucus be to change it? What minerals do clays consist of? What do you think? You are not familiar with the dry method of stacking and storing tails? This problem is solved, but you do not know about it?" He did not answer.

Sophia Yi  (China) wrote a comment on the publication: " it seems too wet, we have the industrial dryer(http://www.futemac.com/dryer_machine/industrial-dryer.html?from=sns_wu), maybe it can help for the further processing"

I wrote to Sophia Yi: "Can you explain to me? How will it help? You will get carcinogenic dust, not dirt." She did not answer.

It is very easy to like if you don't understand anything in this question.

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya