Thursday, 28 February 2019

Together they go on the wrong path and make pseudoscience

The man wrote: "Thirty years ago I was advised that 90% of papers are rubbish. I generally maintain this viewpoint so when I read a weak paper I don't get horrified."

I answed: "You will go to the concert of a singer if 90% of the his songs is trash? I will not go.

Why it should be any different at science?

I believe that articles are written for people to read them and discussed.

Some poorly educated "scientists" make false conclusions, while others repeat and increase these errors. Together they go on the wrong path and make pseudoscience.
It should not be. This is very bad."

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya, 2016
 

Wednesday, 27 February 2019

Gladiolus: Top 10 posts in February, 2019

1. I buy mineral deposit for myself, so I only consider my opinion More

2. Who deleted the drawing from my post about pine oil? (5 in the overall rating) More

3.  I published "I DID NOT RECOMMEND GOLD" and "Gold (2016 film)" and Facebook blocked my account More

4. I not to take away our only means of subsistence More

5.  I help you make the most effective investments in the field of mining More

6.  Do you want to stop the development of mining and metallurgy? You cannot do this. The world will never be the same More

7.  WE ARE COSMOPOLITAN! More

8. One asked me: "They found a giant REE deposit at the bottom of the ocean. What is your opinion?"  More

9. To participate in the tender, you must send me the following information More

10. I am looking for a good lawyer to protect my copyright who knows how to make good money on this situation More

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Gladiolus: Top 10 country in February

Persons from these countries most often visit the blog Gladiolus in Febuary:

1. United States (1 in the overall rating)
2. France (3 in the overall rating)
3. Germany (4 in the overall rating)
4. Chile (2 in the overall rating)
5. Ukraine (6 in the overall rating)
6. United Kingdom (9 in the overall rating)
7. Unknown Region (5 in the overall rating)
8. Japan
9. Canada (8 in the overall rating)
10. Russia (7 in the overall rating)

Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

Tuesday, 26 February 2019

I am completely free to cooperate with positive persons and companies from all over the world who want to really create new high technology and want to earn money with me!

    •     We started the design and construction of our new mining plant. This is a new generation plant for efficiency, but with minimal cost.
    •     I'm leaving Chile.
    •     I did not sign any contracts.
    •     I did not give permission to use my name for any company and persons.
    •     I do not have intermediaries and obligations.
    •     I did not sign 'Non-disclosure Agreement' (NDA). Never. With no one.
    •     I am not affiliated with any companies, nor in any way.
    •     I am not interested in politics.
    •     We are cosmopolitan
    •     I’m not looking for a job in any country.
    •     I’m not interested in positions in universities and companies.
    •     All my scientific products belong only to me.
    •     We are the only creators, developers and right-holders of our developments.
    •     We do not have intermediaries.
    If you hear something different about us, then do not believe it!

    In connection with the unhealthy interest and aggressive hunting of a number of countries and large companies to my science-intensive products, there is no a privacy of my correspondence in e-mail and social networks.

     
    We do not have intermediaries. You can contact us directly: 
    benefication@protonmail.ch
    mineral.modeling@protonmail.com
    For serious negotiations, you can use the Telegram Secret Chat here
    (it is better to use only this type of communication in all cases).

    Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya & Ph.D. Igor Bobin

    Sunday, 24 February 2019

    It is very good that they use my intellectual property, but they have to pay for everything

     Why are scientific articles published in closed journals that are not free to access?
    There are several reasons.
    1.  I can not see that they are useless (and even harmful), because I do not have the opportunity to read them.
    2. I can not see that they used my scientific knowledge, information from my site, my statements. 

    They hide it in closed journals, something they took from me without my permission.
    I found several articles in closed journals that used my publications (worldwide). I did not give permission.

    I will understand the situation and apply to the courts for the protection of my copyright.

    It is very good that they use my intellectual property, but they have to pay for everything.


    Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

    Here I used drawing from the site http://www.ipwatchdog.com

     

    Wednesday, 13 February 2019

    Be careful! Unknown people hacked my accounts again!

    Dear colleagues!
    I advise you not to trust 100% of my messages, letters and clicks, which you see.
    Recheck the information!

    Conversely, if you have not received an answer from me within three days, I advise you to find a way to contact me again.

    Be careful! Unknown people systematically hack into my accounts. 2 step verification does not work for several days.
    I constantly change my key, I use additional protection. But this does not always help.
    Sincerely.

    Ph. D. Natalia Petrovskaya

    Thursday, 7 February 2019

    One asked me: "They found a giant REE deposit at the bottom of the ocean. What is your opinion?"

    One asked me: "They found a giant REE deposit at the bottom of the ocean. They write that "That's equivalent to 780 years' worth of yttrium supply, 620 years of europium, 420 years of terbium and 730 years of dysprosium."  What is your opinion?"

    I answered: "I do not have enough data. Do not rush to participate in this project. While it is the same as mining metals from meteorites.
     
    First of all, they did not provide any evidence that they have a good REE deposit, and not just another field of apatite, thorite, fluorite, brockite or others. Such occurrence are unpromising for the production of REE.

    Secondly, the economy. They themselves know that it is very expensive: "Extracting those metals from the seabed, however, is an expensive affair...."

    I advise you to start from the beginning and answer the question "Is your occurrence a mineral deposit or no. More
      
    Only after that can I answer your question.

    Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

    Tuesday, 5 February 2019

    You need my "Mineral Benefication Information System" and "Petrovsky's Matrix"

    You send me many letters asking me to write my business plan. It is right that you are interested in my opinion. I worked in different universities of the world. I communicate a lot online with different people. I can share my independent opinion about mining in the world.  

    Everywhere is the same. There is no laboratory in the world has enough equipment and specialists to create new generation technologies. Problems are growing. Traditional types of ores are running out but for new ores there is no technology.

    I considered the costs and did not create a laboratory. I created  "PETROVSKY´S MATRIX". For many years I have been working on creating a "Mineral Benefication Information System". I create it with my own money and am the only copyright holder. 

    This system you need. I don't need it.

    I can create 5 competing technologies for any ore without any information system. It is very difficult and only I can do it.  

    You need my "Mineral Benefication Information System" and "Petrovsky's Matrix". 

    No need to teach anyone. For this, you will need centuries of hard work and the abandonment of all your stereotypes, theories and delusions. I think that for you it is almost impossible in the near future. You need just to buy a my smart "Mineral Benefication Information System" and "Petrovsky's Matrix" and let it work. More
     

     



    Monday, 4 February 2019

    Hackers attack my computers almost every day

    All my accounts are hacked.  
    They attack my computers almost every day for hacker attacks. They reconfigure antivirus software for a reduced level of protection on my computer. They changed the language in English in antivirus protection on my computer.

    Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

    Sunday, 3 February 2019

    A good salesman can persuade an Eskimo to bought the snow during the winter

    We are so different. 
    You and I have different goals and objectives. 

     I am a practicing scientist. I am an independent expert. 
    I can recommend the best for my clients
    My goal: I find right solution, I help to get enormous profits with very little investment.
    I know that this is possible. I'm doing it. 

    You are a seller.  
    Your goal: You increase the profits of your company, you increase the volume of sales of equipment. Seller makes no difference that he sells. 
    The main purpose - to persuade the buyer.  
    A good salesman can persuade an Eskimo to bought the snow during the winter. More

    Ph.D. Natali Petrovskaya

    GOLD is not FOOL'S GOLD!

    Ben Murphy  (Mineral Processing / Sales Development, Denver, Colorado, US) wrote "Am I selecting the best equipment for the job or just the equipment I know?" More


    One wrote about Flash Flotation: "Gold, chromite, galena, sphalerite and also porphyry ore can be applied examples in the literature ..."

     I answered: "You want to say that you can get the gold concentrate in the process of your head?
     Can you imagine how many chemical reactions must occur before the collector will be fixed on the surface of gold?

    Gold has a very large delay in the flotation. Flash flotation is not suitable for the flotation of gold.

    The remaining minerals are also questionable. We analyzed dozens copper sulphide deposits within the same region. Only one field was getting reasonable to use "copper head"."
      
    One wrote: "....as it can be applied after well studied the mineralogy, Laboratory flotation test, Pilot plant..."

    I answered: "Why pay big money for useless work (Laboratory flotation test, Pilot plant)? You can explain to me?

    Many of the things you have suggested are not possible from a theoretical point of view and are absolutely useless from the practical side."

    This is the worst decision I've ever met (Flotation for large particles of gold). There are standard solutions that are more effective.

     Bianca Newcombe (OptiFroth Solutions) replied that "she flotats FOOL'S GOLD (pyrite)." But, they tell everyone, that they flotate gold.

     Gold is not FOOL'S GOLD (pyrite)!

    I answered: "You confuse the concepts: 
    !. You confuse the flotation of pyrite and gold. These are different technologies. How can you leave them in one row? 
    2. Pyrite and gold float in any machina de flotation. For flotation of gold, it is advisable to use Self-aerated mechanical flotation machines, but not a Flash. 
    3. In addition, I will write again "The goal is to get FINISHED flotation concentrate in the head of process." 
    For gold, this is not possible. What is the quality of gold concentrate you got? 15 grams per ton? 
    But this is not the purpose of Flash flotation. You got confused and confused people.

    Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya 
     February 2017



    Saturday, 2 February 2019

    One asked me: "Geologists have discovered a new site in Canada. This ore contains chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite. What risks?"

    One asked me: "Geologists have discovered a new site in Canada. This ore contains chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite. What risks?"

    My answer: "The risks are very high. Geologists have made gross errors. Investors can lose a money with this content. Canadian geologists have found pyrrhotite, but they did not find pyrite."

    I gave this forecast in 2017. I was right. 2 years have passed.  I did not read that they were able to solve this problem.

     Do not waste your time on useless projects.
     
    Visit my The consulting.

    Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya