The man wrote: "Thirty years ago I was advised that 90% of papers are rubbish. I generally maintain this viewpoint so when I read a weak paper I don't get horrified."
I answed: "You will go to the concert of a singer if 90% of the his songs is trash? I will not go.
Why it should be any different at science?
I believe that articles are written for people to read them and discussed.
Some poorly educated "scientists" make false conclusions, while others repeat and increase these errors. Together they go on the wrong path and make pseudoscience.
It should not be. This is very bad."
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya, 2016
I answed: "You will go to the concert of a singer if 90% of the his songs is trash? I will not go.
Why it should be any different at science?
I believe that articles are written for people to read them and discussed.
Some poorly educated "scientists" make false conclusions, while others repeat and increase these errors. Together they go on the wrong path and make pseudoscience.
It should not be. This is very bad."
Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment