Real scientists should first study what classical authors write on this issue, and then proceed to scientific research

One asked me in Linkedin: "Maybe they created a new version of flotation?"

I answered him: "This is my classification of flotation types. What "new version of flotation" are you asking about?"
AND LINCEDIN IN GENERAL BLOCKED MY ACCOUNT FOR A LONG TIME.

I think that real scientists should first study what classical authors write on this issue, and then proceed to scientific research. 

For example, FUNDAMENTALS OF THE THEORY OF FLOTATION By Ph.D. Natalia Petrovskaya

P.S.  We discussed the article "Researchers of University of Rochester in New York wrote "These grooves made the surface superhydrophobic by allowing it to capture air and repel water."" More

PhD. Natalia Petrovskaya 

 You can read also:

 This is a completely different mechanism of action

 Why do you believe? You do not have enough knowledge to question the words of scientists

These researchers are engaged in nanotechnology and their research has a narrow specific application

That's who develops American science today